Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Strauss, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Strauss, B.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1989 Oxford University Press

research-article

The relationship between O6-alkylguanine alkyltransferase activity and sensitivity to alkylation-induced sister chromatid exchanges in human lymphoblastoid cell lines

Jeffrey L. Schwartz, Thomas Turkula, Daphna Sagher and Bernard Strauss

Departments of Radiation and Cellular Oncology and Molecular Genetics and Cell Biology, The University of Chicago Chicago, IL 60637, USA

We investigated the relationship between the ability to repair the O6-alkylguanine lesions and sister chromatid exchange (SCE) induction. Six human lymphoblastoid cell lines, with O6-alkylguanine alkyltransferase (AGT) activities ranging from 0 to 13.2 fmol/µg DNA, were tested for their sensitivity to N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG)-, methyl methanesulfonate (MMS)- and 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea (BCNU)-induced SCEs. L33, a long established lymphoblastoid cell line with no AGT activity, was sensitive to all three alkylating agents. In the other more recently established Epstein-Barr virus transformed cell lines, no correlation between AGT activity (ranging from 2.4 to 13.2 fmol/µg DNA) and sensitivity to MMS or MNNG was noted. In fact, of these five cell lines, the cell line with the highest AGT activity, line 852A, was the most sensitive to MNNG-induced SCEs. While cell lines differed in overall alkylation by MNNG, no relationship between overall akylation and sensitivity to MNNG-induced SCE formation was noted. In contrast to the results with the monofunctional alkylating agents, there was a correlation between AGT activity and BCNU-sensitivity to SCE induction. Cell lines with low AGT activities were more sensitive to the bifunctional alkylating agent than cells with higher activities. Therefore, while DNA interstrand cross-links produced by BCNU exposure probably underlie SCE induction by this agent, the lesions and processes that lead to SCE induction after exposure to monofunctional alkylating agents remain unclear.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Anticancer ResHome page
D. BOCANGEL, S. SENGUPTA, S. MITRA, and K. K. BHAKAT
p53-Mediated Down-regulation of the Human DNA Repair Gene O6-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase (MGMT) via Interaction with Sp1 Transcription Factor
Anticancer Res, October 1, 2009; 29(10): 3741 - 3750.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 MutagenesisHome page
P. Morales-Ramirez, T. Vallarino-Kelly, V. L. Cruz-Vallejo, R. Lopez-Iturbe, and H. Alvaro-Delgadillo
In vivo kinetics of micronuclei induction by bifunctional alkylating antineoplastics
Mutagenesis, May 1, 2004; 19(3): 207 - 213.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.