Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bakale, G.
Right arrow Articles by McCreary, R. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bakale, G.
Right arrow Articles by McCreary, R. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1990 Oxford University Press

other

Response of the ke test to NCI/NTP-screened chemicals. I. Non-genotoxic carcinogens and genotoxic non-carcinogens

George Bakale and Richard D. McCreary

Case Western Reserve University, Radiology Department, Division of Biochemical Oncology Cleveland, OH 44106, USA

The responses of a physico-chemical carcinogen-screening test, the ke test, to 46 rodent carcinogens and 20 putative non-carcinogens that had been screened in long-term two-species bioassays by the National Cancer Institute/National Toxicology Program are reported. All of the chemicals screened are those that yield mutagenicity responses in the Ames Salmonella/microsome test that are either equivocal or contrary to the rodent carcinogenicity responses. The electron attachment rate constants, kes, of the test chemicals in cyclohexane at 21°C were measured using a pulse-conductivity technique. The kes of 27 of the 46 rodent carcinogens (59%) are equal or greater than the diffusion-controlled ke of carbon tetrachloride, which is regarded as the boundary between a positive and negative response; the kes of 8 of the 20 mutagenic non-carcinogens (40%) are less than diffusion-controlled. If the boundary between positive and negative ke responses is decreased to half the diffusion-controlled ke, six additional carcinogens yield a positive ke response which increases the ke test sensitivity to 72% while the specificity to non-carcinogens remains at 40%. Comparison of these kes with measures of the chemicals' electrophilicity that had been inferred from chemical structure indicates that ke provides a markedly different measure of electrophilicity and one that complements the Ames Salmnella assay. The use of the ke test as an analytical tool to indicate the presence of electron-attaching impurities in solvents such as benzene is discussed, as is the sensitivity of the ke test to rodent-liver carcinogens.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.