Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gerbracht, U.
Right arrow Articles by Eigenbrodt, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gerbracht, U.
Right arrow Articles by Eigenbrodt, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1990 Oxford University Press

other

Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate alters carbohydrate enzyme activites and foci incidence in rat liver

U. Gerbracht 1, C. Einig, D. Oesterle 2, E. Deml 2, B. Schlatterer 3 and E. Eigenbrodt

Institute of Veterinary Biochemustry, University of Geissen Berlin, FRG
2Institute of Toxicology, GSF Neuherberg Berlin, FRG
3Umweltbundesamt Berlin, FRG

The effect of di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP) on diethyl nitrosainlne (DEN)-initiated preneoplastic liver lesions with expression of gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase (GGTase) and loss of adenosine trlphosphatase (ATPase) as well as alterations of hepatic carbohydrate metabolism in male and female Sprague-Dawley rats have been investigated. Two treatment schedules have been compared with respect to their sensitivity by the histochemical demonstration of preneoplastic islands and by the biochemical determination of alterations in enzyme activities of liver homogenates and of serum, the last indicating hepatotoxicity. For initiation, a single dose of DEN was given, followed by treatment with various doses of DEHP given three times weekly by gavage for 7 or 11 consecutive weeks. As histochemical enzyme markers, the expression of positive GGTase as well as the deficiency in ATPase were used for identification of liver foci. The weanling female rats (protocol A) were found to be more sensitive to the carcinogenic effect of DEN in view of foci incidence than the mature male rats which underwent partial hepatectomy prior to DEN application. The administration of 200 mg DEHP/kg body increased the incidence of ATPase-deficient foci in both male and female rats; however, concentrations of 1000 and 2000 mg DEHP/kg decreased the incidence of liver foci. The number of foci with expression of GGTase was only slightly increased in female rats following a DELIP concentration of 50 mg/kg, and 200 mg/kg body wt. DEHP alone did not induce preneoplastic lesions that could be identified by these two markers. Biochemical investigations indicate that DEHP alters the metabolic pattern in liver. An increase of the NADP-linked enzymes glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PDH), malic enzyme, extra-mitochondrial ICDH as well as an enhancement of NAD-dependent {alpha}-G3PDH and lactate dehydrogenase were found following DEHP administration. On the other hand the glycolytlc enzymes pyruvate kinase (PK) and enolase as well as the gluconeogenelic enzyme fructose-1,6.-bisphosphatase (FBPase) were significantly reduced. In protocol B (male rats) the reactions of PK, FBPase and malic enzyme were more altered after DEHP exposure than in protocol A, while the activity of G6PDH was more increased in protocol A. Most enzymes being involved in the carbohydrate metabolism are influenced by DEHP In a dose-dependent manner. There was no increase in senim FBPase activity in both male and female rats after DEHP treatment but a reduction of glutamate-oxalate-transaminase and glutainate-pyruvate-transaminase activities was observed. This and the fact that the control and DEHP-treated animals had similar weight gains indicate that DEHP does not exert a significant hepatotoxicity effect.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Toxicol Ind HealthHome page
Regulations and Advisories
Toxicology and Industrial Health, September 1, 1999; 15(8): 718 - 742.
[PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.