Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (83)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ullah, A.
Right arrow Articles by Shamsuddin, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ullah, A.
Right arrow Articles by Shamsuddin, A. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1990 Oxford University Press

other

Dose-dependent inhibition of large intestinal cancer by inositol hexaphosphate in F344 rats

Asad Ullah and Abulkalam M. Shamsuddin 1

Department of Pathology, University of Maryland, School of Medicine Baltimore, MD 21201, USA

1To whom correspondence should be addressed

We have previously reported that inositol hexaphosphate (InsP6) inhibits mitosis and large intestinal cancer (LIC) in F344 rats and CD1 mice when given as 1 or 2% solution in drinking water at the unadjusted pH of 11.3. The purpose of this study was to determine whether InsP6 (i) shows a dose-response inhibition of LIC, and (ii) retains its anti neoplastic effect at physiological pH. Since InsP6 is known to be a chelator of divalent catiofis, in preparation for putative clinical trials in humans, we also looked at the mineral bioavallability. F344 rats were fed 0.1% (pH 10.8), 1% (pH 11.3) and 1% (pH 7.4) Na-InsP6 in drinking water. Two weeks following the beginning of InsP6 supplementation, rats were given six injections of azoxymethane (AOM) at a dose of 8 mg/kg body wt/week and were killed 30 weeks following the last injection. Compared to the untreated control rats injected with AOM, 1% InsP6 (pH 11.3) reduces tumor prevalence by 52.2% (P < 0.01), tumor frequency by 55.8% (P = 0.001) and tumor size by 62.3% (P = 0.001); 0.1% InsP6 showed a lesser reduction in tumor prevalence (21%) but a greater reduction in tumor size 71% (P = 0.001). While there was no significant difference in tumor prevalence and frequency between the two pH groups, the tumor size following 1% InsP6 (pH 7.4) was the smallest (65% smaller than those of pH 11.3, P < 0.005). There was no significant difference in the serum Mg2+, Ca2+ Fe2+ and Zn2+ level between control rats and those treated with 1% InsP6 We therefore demonstrate that InsP6 (i) is consistently anti neoplastic for LIC in a dose-dependent manner, (ii) retains its anti-neoplastic activity at physiological pH and (iii) has no demonstrable toxic effect on long-term administration as evident by body wt data and serum mineral levels.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
J. Liao, D. N. Seril, A. L. Yang, G. G. Lu, and G.-Y. Yang
Inhibition of chronic ulcerative colitis associated adenocarcinoma development in mice by inositol compounds
Carcinogenesis, February 1, 2007; 28(2): 446 - 454.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
I. Vucenik, A. Passaniti, M. I. Vitolo, K. Tantivejkul, P. Eggleton, and A. M. Shamsuddin
Anti-angiogenic activity of inositol hexaphosphate (IP6)
Carcinogenesis, November 1, 2004; 25(11): 2115 - 2123.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
I. Vucenik and A. M. Shamsuddin
Cancer Inhibition by Inositol Hexaphosphate (IP6) and Inositol: From Laboratory to Clinic
J. Nutr., November 1, 2003; 133(11): 3778S - 3784.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
X. Zi, R. P. Singh, and R. Agarwal
Impairment of erbB1 receptor and fluid-phase endocytosis and associated mitogenic signaling by inositol hexaphosphate in human prostate carcinoma DU145 cells
Carcinogenesis, December 1, 2000; 21(12): 2225 - 2235.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
B. S. Reddy, Y. Hirose, L. A. Cohen, B. Simi, I. Cooma, and C. V. Rao
Preventive Potential of Wheat Bran Fractions against Experimental Colon Carcinogenesis: Implications for Human Colon Cancer Prevention
Cancer Res., September 1, 2000; 60(17): 4792 - 4797.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
GutHome page
R W Owen, B Spiegelhalder, and H Bartsch
Generation of reactive oxygen species by the faecal matrix
Gut, February 1, 2000; 46(2): 225 - 232.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
J. S. Hughes, C. Ganthavorn, and S. Wilson-Sanders
Dry Beans Inhibit Azoxymethane-Induced Colon Carcinogenesis in F344 Rats
J. Nutr., December 1, 1997; 127(12): 2328 - 2333.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.