| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 1990 Oxford University Press
article-commentary |
Dose-response relationship and low dose extrapolatioin in chemical carcinogenesis
Institute of Toxicology, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology and University of Zurich CH-8603 Schwerzenbach, Switzerland
Data supporting various dose-response relationships in chemical carcinogenesis are summarized. General principles are derived to explain the relationships between exposure dose, DNA adduct level, induction of genetic changes, and tumor incidence. Some mechanistic aspects of epigenetic carcinogens (stimulation of cell division and maldifferentiation) are analyzed in a similar way. In a homogeneous population, non-linearities are frequent. They are due to phenomena of induction or saturation of enzymatic activities and to the multi-step nature of carcinogenesis: if a carcinogen accelerates more than one step, the superposition of the dose-response curves for the individual steps can result in an exponential relationship. A fourth power of the dose was the maximum seen in animals (formaldehyde). At the lowest dose levels, a proportionality between dose and tumor induction is postulated independent of the mechanism of action if the carcinogen accelerates the endogenous process responsible for spontaneous tumor formation. Low-dose thresholds are expected only for situations where the carcinogen acts in a way that has no endogenous counterpart. Epidemlological studies in humans show linear dose-response curves in all but two investigations. The difference from the strongly non-linear slopes seen in animal studies could be due to the heterogeneity of the human population: if the individual sensitivity to a carcinogen is governed by a large number of genetic and life-style factors, the non-linearities will tend to cancel each other out and the dose-response curve becomes ‘quasi-linear’.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  Y Yang, X. Jin, C. Yan, Y Tian, J. Tang, and X. Shen Urinary level of nickel and acute leukaemia in Chinese children Toxicology and Industrial Health, October 1, 2008; 24(9): 603 - 610. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. Rached, G. C. Hard, K. Blumbach, K. Weber, R. Draheim, W. K. Lutz, S. Ozden, U. Steger, W. Dekant, and A. Mally Ochratoxin A: 13-Week Oral Toxicity and Cell Proliferation in Male F344/N Rats Toxicol. Sci., June 1, 2007; 97(2): 288 - 298. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. H. Doak, G. J.S. Jenkins, G. E. Johnson, E. Quick, E. M. Parry, and J. M. Parry Mechanistic Influences for Mutation Induction Curves after Exposure to DNA-Reactive Carcinogens Cancer Res., April 15, 2007; 67(8): 3904 - 3911. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Tuntawiroon, C. Mahidol, P. Navasumrit, H. Autrup, and M. Ruchirawat Increased health risk in Bangkok children exposed to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from traffic-related sources Carcinogenesis, April 1, 2007; 28(4): 816 - 822. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. B. Conolly and W. K. Lutz Nonmonotonic Dose-Response Relationships: Mechanistic Basis, Kinetic Modeling, and Implications for Risk Assessment Toxicol. Sci., January 1, 2004; 77(1): 151 - 157. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. Stopper, S. O. Mueller, and W. K. Lutz Supra-additive genotoxicity of a combination of {gamma}-irradiation and ethyl methanesulfonate in mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells Mutagenesis, May 1, 2000; 15(3): 235 - 238. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W K Lutz Dose-response relationships in chemical carcinogenesis reflect differences in individual susceptibility. Consequences for cancer risk assessment, extrapolation, and prevention Human and Experimental Toxicology, December 1, 1999; 18(12): 707 - 712. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K.-Y. Wu, A. Ranasinghe, P. B. Upton, V. E. Walker, and J. A. Swenberg Molecular dosimetry of endogenous and ethylene oxide-induced N7-(2-hydroxyethyl) guanine formation in tissues of rodents Carcinogenesis, September 1, 1999; 20(9): 1787 - 1792. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|