Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (44)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bursch, W.
Right arrow Articles by Schutte-Hermann, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bursch, W.
Right arrow Articles by Schutte-Hermann, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1991 Oxford University Press

research-article

Control of cell death (apoptosis) by diethylstilbestrol in an estrogen-dependent kidney tumor

Wilfried Bursch, Joachim G. Liehr 1, David A. Sirbasku 2, Barbara Putz 3, Henryk Taper 4 and Rolf Schutte-Hermann

Institut für Tumorbiologie-Krebsforschung, University of Vienna Vienna, Austria
1Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Texas Medical Branch Galveston, TX
2Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Texas Medical School Houston, TX, USA
3Department of Toxicology, Schering AG Berlin, FRG
4Unité de Biochimie Toxicologique et Cancerologique, Université Catholique de Louvain UCL 7369 Bruxelles, Belgium

The role of cell death as a determinant for tumor growth and regression was studied using an estrogen-dependent, trans-plantable kidney tumor designated H301. H301 cells were injected s.c. into diethylstilbestrol(DES)-treated male Syrian hamsters and developed solid tumors of 1–2 g within 2–3 weeks. Upon withdrawal of estrogen the tumors regressed by 80–90% within 4 days. Mitoses, necrotic areas and single-cell death indicated by small, condensed cell residues, were counted in hematoxylin and eosin stained histologkal sections of the tumors. Coincident with tumor regression after DES withdrawal, mitotk activity decreased by {bsim} 90%; the rate of single-cell death increased (by {bsim} 2-fold at its maximum). The incidence of necrotic areas was not affected by DES withdrawal. DES re-treatment resulted in reduction of single-cell death by 80% within 8 h. Mitotic activity increased within 24 h to the level observed before DES withdrawal. Again, the incidence of necrotic areas did not change. As a result, tumors re-grew to their previous size within 2 days after resumption of DES treatment. These results led to the following conclusions: (i) DES treatment inhibits and DES withdrawal enhances single-cell death of H301 tumor cells. (ii) Both this functional property and its morphology characterize single-cell death in the tumors as apoptosis. (iii) Estrogen-dependent cell death determines, in addition to mitosis and necrosis, the growth rate of H301 tumors, (iv) This experimental model may provide a useful tool to study the interaction of potential anti-tumor drugs with apoptosis in neoplasia.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Toxicol PatholHome page
A. Yoshida, R. R. Newbold, and D. Dixon
Effects of Neonatal Diethylstilbestrol (DES) Exposure on Morphology and Growth Patterns of Endometrial Epithelial Cells in CD-1 Mice
Toxicol Pathol, May 1, 1999; 27(3): 325 - 333.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol PatholHome page
R. Schulte-Hermann, W. Bursch, B. Grasl-Kraupp, B. Marian, L. Torok, P. Kahl-Rainer, and A. Ellinger
Concepts of Cell Death and Application to Carcinogenesis
Toxicol Pathol, January 1, 1997; 25(1): 89 - 93.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Reproductive SciencesHome page
A. Palumbo and J. Yeh
Apoptosis as a Basic Mechanism in the Ovarian Cycle: Folicular Atresia and Luteal Regression
Reproductive Sciences, May 1, 1995; 2(3): 565 - 573.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.