© 1992 Oxford University Press
article-commentary |
Chemical carcinogens and overnutrition in diet-related cancer
Institute of Toxicology, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology and University of Zürich
1Toxicology Section, Division of Food Science Swiss Federal Office of Public Health, CH-8603 Schwerzenbach
The intake of known dietary carcinogens was compiled and the cancer risk was estimated on the basis of carcinogenic potencies in animals as derived from the Carcinogenic Potency Database by Gold and co-workers. The total cancer risk was compared with the number of cancer cases attributed by epidemiologists to dietary factors (one-third of all cancer cases, i.e. 
80 000 per one million lives). Except for alcohol, the known dietary carcinogens could not account for more than a few hundred cancer cases. This was seen both with the DNA-reactive carcinogens (heterocyclic aromatic amines, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, N-nitroso compounds, estragole, aflatoxin B1, ethyl carbamate, to name the most important factors) as well as with those carcinogens which have not been shown to react with DNA (e.g. caffeic acid and the carcinogenic metals arsenic and cadmium). Residues and contaminants turned out to be negligible. Among the various possibilities to explain the discrepancy we investigated the role of overnutrition. Dietary restriction in animals is well known for its strong reducing effect on spontaneous tumor formation. These data can be used to derive a carcinogenic potency for excess macronutrients: the tumor incidence seen with the restricted animals is taken as a control value and the increased tumor incidence in the animals fed ad libitum is attributed to the additional feed intake. For excess standard diet in rats, a carcinogenic potency TD50 of 16 g/kg/day was deduced from a recent study. Overnutrition in Switzerland, estimated to be 5.5 kcal/kg/day, was converted to excess food (1.9 g/kg/day) and the cancer incidence was calculated. The result, 60 000 cancer cases per one million lives, is provocatively close to the number of cases not explained by the known dietary chemical carcinogens. Mechanistic studies will be required to test our hypothesis and investigate the role of different types of macronutrients in overnutrition.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  D. E. Corpet and F. Pierre Point: From Animal Models to Prevention of Colon Cancer. Systematic Review of Chemoprevention in Min Mice and Choice of the Model System Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2003; 12(5): 391 - 400. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. D. Boudreau, D. G. Baker, H. W. Taylor, S. A. Barker, and J. C. Means Suppression of Arylamine Toxicity in the Fischer-344 Rat Following Ingestion of a Complex Mixture Toxicol Pathol, April 1, 2001; 29(3): 333 - 343. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Proceedings of the British Toxicology Society Annual Congress University of Surrey, Guildford 19 - 22 April 1998 Human and Experimental Toxicology, September 1, 1998; 17(9): 469 - 534. [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. E. A. Leakey, J. E. Seng, C. R. Barnas, V. M. Baker, and R. W. Hart A Mechanistic Basis for the Beneficial Effects of Caloric Restriction On Longevity and Disease: Consequences for the Interpretation of Rodent Toxicity Studies International Journal of Toxicology, January 1, 1998; 17(2_suppl): 5 - 56. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|