Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Paolini, M.
Right arrow Articles by Cantelli-Forti, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Paolini, M.
Right arrow Articles by Cantelli-Forti, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1992 Oxford University Press

research-article

Strategies for advancement of short-term mutagenicity tests: on the optimal ionic strength for the liver microsomal assay

M. Paolini 1, R. Mesirca 1, L. Pozzetti 1, P. Silingardi 2, S. Grilli 2 and G. Cantelli-Forti 1 3

1Dipartimento di Farmacologica, Laboratori di Biochimica Tossicologica
2Istituto di Cancerologia, Universitá degli Studi di Bologna, Italy
3Division of Environmental Toxicology and Community Health, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA

The aim of this work was to optimize the ionic strength ({tau}) in the liver microsomal assay (LMA) hi performing short-term genotoxicity tests, {tau} optimization would increase the sensitivity (i.e. decrease false negatives) and at the same time increase the specificity (decrease false positives). Such optimization depends upon the relative activities and stabilities of the liver polysubstrate cytochrome P450- and FAD-containing monooxygenase-dependent metabolizing enzymes present in the incubation mixtures. With regard to phase-I pathway, the expression of various P450-like activities (IA1, IA2, IIB1, IIE1, UIA P450 classes) and thiobenzamide s-oxidase (as FAD-MFO marker), were examined in terms of their exact incubation conditions for the LMA during a period of preincubation (1 h) over the {tau} range 0.06–1.40. As a comparison with the phase-II pathway, the behaviour of glutathione S-transferases (total and pi class), gluthathione S-epoxide transferase, epoxide hydrolase and UDP-glucuronosyl transferase were studied. Lipid peroxidation (LP) was also determined. Experiments were performed on S9 fractions derived from sodium phenobarbital, ß-naphthoflavone, isosafrol, ethanol and pregnenolone 16-{alpha} carbonitrile super-induced mouse liver. The maximal value of the mean specific activity (Asp), up to a 46% increase, was found at {tau} = 0.864 for oxidative reactions considered. On the contrary, a slight modulation of Asp for post-oxidative reactions was seen. LP was not changed appreciably by varying {tau}. In vitro DNA binding of the well-known premutagenic agent [14C]dimethylnitrosamine ([14C]DMNA), mediated by mouse hepatic microsomal enzymes, showed a significant increase of specific activity at {tau} = 0.864 (2.25-fold) compared to the usual {tau} (0.06) used. Additional confirmation of these results stems from mutagenesis experiments using DMNA on the diploid D7 strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a biological test system. Indeed, a significant enhancement of mitotic gene conversion (up to 1.8-fold), mitotic crossing-over (2.6-fold) and reverse point mutation (2.6-fold) frequencies was achieved at {tau} = 0.86 compared to {tau} = 0.06 (traditional). These data show that {tau} = 0.86 can provide more convenient conditions for in vitro bioactivation (as exemplified by an increased Asp phase-I/Asp phase-II ratio), as well as DNA binding and genotoxic response.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.