Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bakale, G.
Right arrow Articles by MCCreary, R. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bakale, G.
Right arrow Articles by MCCreary, R. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1992 Oxford University Press

research-article

Response of the ke, test to NCI/NTP-screened chemicals. II. Genotoxic carcinogens and non-genotoxic non-carcinogens

George Bakale and Richard D. MCCreary

Case Western Reserve University, Department of Radiology, Biochemical Oncology Division Cleveland, OH 44106-5000, USA

A physico-chemical carcinogen-screening test was used to measure the rate constants of electron attachment, KeS, of 105 chemicals that had been screened in long-term rodent bioassays and short-term in vitro tests by the NCI/NTP. In the Ke, test, a pulse-conductivity technique is used to generateand monitor the decay of excess electrons that serve as nucleophilic surrogates for the target tissue of rodents. Of the 61 chemicals that had been found to be rodent carcinogens as well as Salmonella mutagens, 36 yield KeS that are equal to or greater than the diffusion-controlled Ke, of carbon tetrachloride and are considered to be postive Ke, test responses. In contrast, 29 of the remaining 44 chemicals that are putative non-carcinogens and non-mutagens yield KeS that are negative Ke, test responses. These results are combined with the Ke, responses of 46 non-mutagenic carcinogens and 20 mutagenic non-carcinogens that were reported earlier and are evaluated to determine the degree to which the measure of electron-accepting capacity that Ke, provides complements or overlaps the electrophilicity or DNA reactivity of chemicals that is indicated by positive mutagenicity responses in the Ames Salmonella tester strains or by postive structural alerts, S/As, of the chemicals. The combined ke, test results indicate that the overall predictivity of the ke, test is comparable to and complements the Ames Salmonella test and S/As in identifying rodent carcinogens. Moreover, the electrons serve as non-discriminate nucleophilic targets for both genotoxic and non-genotoxic electronaccepting molecules and appear to attach with equal efficiency to carcinogens that are active in various tissues of rodents. This property of excess electrons suggests that the predictivity of the ke, test could be enhanced by combining the measured ke, with an appropriate lipophilicity or pharmacokinetic parameter. A pre-chemical electron-transfer step that had been proposed to precede chemical interaction between the carcinogen and target tissue is discussed in light of recent developments in electron-donor/-acceptor chemistry and in the application of structure-activity relationships to identify carcinogens.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
International Journal of ToxicologyHome page
Annual Review of Cosmetic Ingredient Safety Assessments--2002/2003
International Journal of Toxicology, January 1, 2005; 24(1_suppl): 1 - 2.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.