Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (54)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hayashi, F.
Right arrow Articles by Suga, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hayashi, F.
Right arrow Articles by Suga, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1994 Oxford University Press

research-article

Characteristics of the hepatocarcinogenesis caused by dehydroepiandrosterone, a peroxisome proliferator, in male F-344 rats

Fumihiko Hayashi, Hiroshi Tamura 2, Junji Yamada, Hiroshi Kasai 1 and Tetsuya Suga

Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Tokyo College of Pharmacy Horinouchi 1432–1, Hachioji, Tokyo 192–03
1Department of Environmental Oncology, Institute of Industrial Ecological Sciences, University of Occupational and Environmental Health 1–1 Iseigaoka, Yahatanishi-ku, Kitakyushu 807, Japan

2To whom correspondence should be addressed

The characteristics of the hepatocarcinogenesis induced by dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) were compared with that induced by other peroxisome proliferators such as [4-chloro-6-(2,3-xylidino)-2-pyrimidinylthio]acetic acid (Wy-14,643) and di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP). Male F-344 rats were given a diet containing DHEA at 0.5 or 1%, Wy-14,643 at 0.1% and DEHP at 2% for up to 78 weeks. In rats fed 0.5 or 1% DHEA the incidence of neoplasias was 20% after 52 weeks. At 78 weeks all rats treated with 1% DHEA had numerous grossly visible nodules and the incidence of hepatic neoplasia was dose-dependent The magnitude of hepatocellular tumorigenicity after DHEA treatment was less potent than that after Wy-14,643, but more than that after DEHP treatment. Peroxisomal [3-oxidation activity increased three- or six-fold after a 10 week course of 0.5 or 1% DHEA respectively and this was significantly lower than that induced in Wy-14,643- or DEHP-fed rats. From 52 to 78 weeks these activities increased 3–9 times over that in controls. In both the group of rats treated with Wy-14,643 and those treated with DEHP, peroxisomal p-oxidation constantly increased 11- to 15-fold during the experiment Catalase activity increased 1.3- to 1.5-fold for the first 10 weeks of DHEA treatmentand then recovered to the control level. The activities of glutathione peroxidase and glutathione S-transferase decreased markedly after 30 weeks in DHEA-treated rats and the decreases were sustained for up to 78 weeks. The profile of changes in enzyme activities in the rats fed DHEA was not significantly different from that of those fed Wy-14,643 or DEHP. There were no increases in 8- hydroxydeoxyguanosine, oxidative DNA damage or lipid peroxide level in the liver in any of the treated rats at 10 or 30 weeks. Since these results showed that the characteristics of hepatocarcinogenesis caused by DHEA were basically similar to those caused by Wy-14,643 and DEHP, typical peroxisome proliferators, hepatocarcinogenesis induced by DHEA is probably due to the same mechanisms as that induced by general peroxisome proliferators.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
D. L. McCormick, W. D. Johnson, N. M. Kozub, K.V.N. Rao, R. A. Lubet, V. E. Steele, and M. C. Bosland
Chemoprevention of rat prostate carcinogenesis by dietary 16{alpha}-fluoro-5-androsten-17-one (fluasterone), a minimally androgenic analog of dehydroepiandrosterone
Carcinogenesis, February 1, 2007; 28(2): 398 - 403.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol PatholHome page
D. Mayer, K. Forstner, and K. Kopplow
Induction and Modulation of Hepatic Preneoplasia and Neoplasia in the Rat by Dehydroepiandrosterone
Toxicol Pathol, January 1, 2003; 31(1): 103 - 112.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
M. M. Simile, M. R. De Miglio, D. Calvisi, M. R. Muroni, M. Frau, G. Asara, L. Daino, L. Deiana, R. M. Pascale, and F. Feo
Long-term dehydroepiandrosterone and 16{{alpha}}-fluoro-5-androsten-17-one administration enhances DNA synthesis and induces expression of c-fos and c-Ha-ras in a selected population of preneoplastic lesions in liver of diethylnitrosamine-initiated rats
Carcinogenesis, February 1, 2001; 22(2): 301 - 308.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
G. P. Collett, A. M. Betts, M. I. Johnson, A. B. Pulimood, S. Cook, D. E. Neal, and C. N. Robson
Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor {{alpha}} Is an Androgen-responsive Gene in Human Prostate and Is Highly Expressed in Prostatic Adenocarcinoma
Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2000; 6(8): 3241 - 3248.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
K. V. N. Rao, W. D. Johnson, M. C. Bosland, R. A. Lubet, V. E. Steele, G. J. Kelloff, and D. L. McCormick
Chemoprevention of Rat Prostate Carcinogenesis by Early and Delayed Administration of Dehydroepiandrosterone
Cancer Res., July 1, 1999; 59(13): 3084 - 3089.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. PsychiatryHome page
O. M. Wolkowitz, V. I. Reus, A. Keebler, N. Nelson, M. Friedland, L. Brizendine, and E. Roberts
Double-Blind Treatment of Major Depression With Dehydroepiandrosterone
Am J Psychiatry, April 1, 1999; 156(4): 646 - 649.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Toxicol PatholHome page
C. Metzger, D. Mayer, H. Hoffmann, T. Bocker, G. Hobe, A. Benner, and P. Bannasch
Sequential Appearance and Ultrastructure of Amphophilic Cell Foci, Adenomas, and Carcinomas in the Liver of Male and Female Rats Treated with Dehydroepiandrosterone
Toxicol Pathol, September 1, 1995; 23(5): 591 - 605.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.