Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (23)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dragan, Y.P.
Right arrow Articles by Pilot, H.C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dragan, Y.P.
Right arrow Articles by Pilot, H.C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1994 Oxford University Press

research-article

Focal and non-focal hepatic expression of placental glutathione S-transferase in carcinogen-treated rats

Y.P. Dragan, H.A. Campbell, K. Baker, J. Vaughan, M. Mass 1 and H.C. Pilot 2

McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, University of Wisconsin Madison, WI 53706
1United States Environmental Protection Agency, Genetic Toxicology and Metabolism Branch, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA

2To whom reprint requests should be addressed

Carcinogenesis develops in stages that have been operationally defined as initiation, promotion and progression. Although morphological end points have been described for detection and quantitation of these stages, to date initiation has been assessed only in the context of clonal growth in response to certain promoting agents. Initiated cells are morphologicatly indistinguishable from surrounding cells and early changes at the cellular level during initiation have not been clarified. One commonly used end point for the detection of preneoplastic hepatic lesions is their aberrant expression of the placental isozyme of glutathione S-transferase (PGST). Because single hepato cytes expressing PGST have been detected in aged rats and in those administered hepatocarcinogens, it has been suggested that such cells constitute a population of putat ively initiated hepatocytes. In order to further elucidate the characteristics of single PGST-positive hepatocytes, we analyzed the number of these cells 2 and 18 weeks after various doses (0–100 mg/kg) of diethylnitrosamine (DEN) and of dimethylbenz[a]anthracene (DMBA). When determined 14 days after carcinogen administration, the number of single hepatocytes expressing PGST was greater after DEN administration (ranging from 0.8±0.3 per cm2 transection of liver at 1 mg/kg to 33.0±4.7 at 100 mg/kg) than after DMBA administration (ranging from 0.25±0.14 at 10 mg/kg to 3.03±0.5 at 100 mg/kg); none were detected in control rats of the same age. Additional rats were maintained on a basal diet or a basal diet plus phenobarbital for a further 4 month period. Whereas individual PGST-positive hepatocytes were only sporadically detected in rats treated with DMBA and maintained on a basal diet for 18 weeks, those rats placed on phenobarbital for 16 weeks had an even higher number of such PGST-positive hepato cytes than at 2 weeks after DMBA administration. In contrast, the dose-response curve observed for DEN- treated rats 18 weeks after carcinogen administration was similar to that observed 2 weeks after carcinogen treatment for both phenobarbital- and non-phenobarbital-treated rats. In addition, the number of single PGST-positive hepatocytes detected at 2 weeks was directly parallel to the number of altered hepatic foci expressing PGST 18 weeks after DEN administration. The dose-dependent induction of PGST-positive single hepatocytes after treatment with two hepatocarcinogens, the dose-dependent growth of altered hepatic foci (AHF) expressing PGST with phenobarbital administration and the parallel dose-response curve of single hepatocytes expressing PGST and later of AHF expressing PGST argue strongly for a precursor role of single PGST-positive cells in the development of AHF expressing PGST.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
M. E. Andersen, R. Sarangapani, R. H. Reitz, R. H. Gallavan, I. D. Dobrev, and K. P. Plotzke
Physiological Modeling Reveals Novel Pharmacokinetic Behavior for Inhaled Octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane in Rats
Toxicol. Sci., April 1, 2001; 60(2): 214 - 231.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
International Journal of ToxicologyHome page
H. C. Pitot
The Progression of Neoplasia, Cell Replication, and Electromagnetic Fields
International Journal of Toxicology, January 1, 1998; 17(3_suppl): 59 - 108.
[PDF]


Home page
Toxicol PatholHome page
H. C. Pitot, Y. P Dragan, J. Teeguarden, S. Hsia, and H. Campbell
Quantitation of Multistage Carcinogenesis in Rat Liver
Toxicol Pathol, January 1, 1996; 24(1): 119 - 128.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.