Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (96)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lanfear, J.
Right arrow Articles by Harrison, P. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lanfear, J.
Right arrow Articles by Harrison, P. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1994 Oxford University Press

other

The selenium metabolite selenodiglutathione induces p53 and apoptosis: relevance to the chemopreventive effects of selenium?

Jerry Lanfear, Janis Fleming, Leonard Wu, Gill Webster 1 2 and Paul R. Harrison 3

The Beatson Institute for Cancer Research, Cancer Research Campaign Beatson Laboratories Garscube Estate, Switchback Road, Bearsden, Glasgow G61 1BD
1Professorial Surgical Unit, 5th Floor, King George V. Block, St Bartholomew's Hospital West Smithfield, London EC1A 7BE, UK

2Present address: The Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Department of Vetinary Pathology, The Vetinary School, Garscube Estate, Switchback Road, Bearsden, Glasgow G61 1BD, UK

3To whom correspondence should be addressed

Selenodiglutathione (SDG), the initial metabolite of selenite, is shown to be a more powerful inhibitor of cell growth in vitro than selenite itself. This has been established both with mouse erythroleukaemia (MEL) cells and an ovarian cell line (A2780) which is known to contain wild-type p53. Other seleno-compounds, such as selenomethyl selenocyst-eine (SMS) and dimethyl selenoxide (DMS), which are potent chemopreventive agents and are known to be metabolizedto methylated selenium derivatives directly rather than via SDG, are also growth inhibitory to both MEL and A2780 cells, although less so than SDG or selenite. However, cells growth-inhibited by DMS are more viable than cells growth-inhibitedto the same extent by SDG or selenite, suggesting that the methylated seleno-compounds may inhibit cell growth in a different manner from that of SDG or selenite. Our studies of the mechanism of growth inhibition by SDG, have established two facts. First, SDG induces p53 protein levels in cells that contain wild-type p53 (A2780 cells), suggesting that SDG induces the DNA damage-recognition pathway. Secondly, SDG induces apoptosis in MEL cells, as judged by flow cytometry and formation of nucleosomal DNA ladders. However, since p53 mutations have been found to be targetted events in all MEL cells examined, our evidence suggests that induction of apoptosis by SDG is not absolutely dependent on the p53 response pathway.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.