© 1995 Oxford University Press
research-article |
Cisplatin- and carboplatin-DNA adducts: is Pt-AG the cytotoxic lesion?
TNO Food and Nutrition Research Institute PO Box 5815, 2280 HV Rijswijk, The Netherlands
1To whom correspondence should be addressed
In order to determine the nature of the cytotoxic lesion(s) formed by the antitumour drugs cisplatin and carboplatln, a comparative study was made of bifunctional DNA-adduct formation by these drugs. The kinetics of bifunctional cisplatin adduct formation were studied with DNA in vitro and in cultured Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. Prior to adduct measurements with AAS in in vitro platinated DNA and with ELISA In cellular DNA, the monoadducts were inactivated with thlourea (10 mM; 1 h at 37°C). The data indicated that the conversion of monofunctional to bifunctional adducts with t1/2 of 
2 h (37°C), leads to maxhnuin Intrastrand adduct levels after 4–6 h post Incubation. This Interval coincided with the period during which the cytotoxic effect of cisplatin could be reduced by a 1 h 10 mM thiourea post-Incubation of the cells. The formation of interstrand crosslinks continued for 7 h of post-incubation; then these amounted to 2% of the total DNA adducts. When a DNA sample was dialysed against 0.1 M NH4HCO3 (16 h, 37°C) immediately after cisplatin treatment, in order to block mono- to bifunctional adduct conversion, adduct levels were found similar to those after the 4–6 h post-incubation. From this it is clear that the high values reported earlier for bifunctional cisplatin adducts in such DNA samples are not correct. These values apparently represent the amounts of adducts that eventually would have been formed during post-Incubation in DNA in vitro but also in cells in the absence of cellular repair. The cisplatin data of CHO cells were compared with those after treatment of the cells with equltoxic doses of carboplatin. The data indicate that after 12 h post- incubation, when all bifunctional adducts are formed, the total amount of the various bifunctional adducts after cisplatin treatment (37.5±;4.5 fmol/µg DNA) was in the same range as that after carboplatln (32.8±;6.3 fmol/µg DNA). However, because the relative occurrences of the adducts were different, it could also be concluded that If one of the diadducts were exclusively responsible for the cytotoxic effect of these platinum antitumour drugs, Pt- AG is the only likely candidate.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. L. Fishel, S. M. Delaney, L. D. Friesen, R. J. Hansen, E. G. Zuhowski, R. C. Moschel, M. J. Egorin, and M. E. Dolan Enhancement of Platinum-induced Cytotoxicity by O6-Benzylguanine Mol. Cancer Ther., July 1, 2003; 2(7): 633 - 640. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 I. U. De Silva, P. J. McHugh, P. H. Clingen, and J. A. Hartley Defects in interstrand cross-link uncoupling do not account for the extreme sensitivity of ERCC1 and XPF cells to cisplatin Nucleic Acids Res., September 1, 2002; 30(17): 3848 - 3856. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 I. Krueger, L. H.F. Mullenders, and A. Hartwig Nickel(II) increases the sensitivity of V79 Chinese hamster cells towards cisplatin and transplatin by interference with distinct steps of DNA repair Carcinogenesis, July 1, 1999; 20(7): 1177 - 1184. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|