Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (40)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Budunova, I.V.
Right arrow Articles by Slaga, T.J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Budunova, I.V.
Right arrow Articles by Slaga, T.J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1995 Oxford University Press

research-article

The expression of gap junctional proteins during different stages of mouse skin carcinogenesis

I.V. Budunova, S. Carbajal and T.J. Slaga

The University of Texas M.D.Anderson Cancer Center, Science Park Research Division PO Box 389, Smithville, TX 78957, USA

The loss or alteration of gap junctional intercellular communication (GJIC) has long been proposed to play an important role in the process of carcinogenesis. In this study we examined the expression of three gap junction proteins, connexins (Cx)26, 43 and 31.1, in mouse hyperplastic skin, papillomas and squamous cell carcinomas (SCC). Tumors were induced in SENCAR mice by either of two initiation/promotion protocols: 7,12-dimethylbenz-[a]anthracene (DMBA)/12Otetradecanoyl-phorbol-13-acetate (TPA) or DMBA/benzoyl-peroxide (BzPo). Keratinocytes in adult mouse skin expressed Cx31.1 and Cx43 but did not express Cx26. Skin hyperplasia induced by one topical application of TPA was accompanied by hyper-expression of both Cx26 and Cx43. In addition, TPA significantly inhibited the expression of Cx31.1. After repetitive application of TPA for 3 weeks to initiated mouse skin, a similar Cx profile was found to that after a single TPA application. Connexin 26 and Cx43 were hyper-expressed in most of the papillomas studied (20–40 weeks after initiation). However, in some late papillomas, immunostaining revealed a focal loss of Cx26. Immunostaining of mouse skin SCC revealed decreased Cx43 and Cx26 levels in 65% and 85% of cases respectively. The high levels of Cx26 and Cx43 mRNA in most of the SCC did not correlate with the decreased abundance or disappearance of Cx26 and Cx43 immunoreactive spots from tumor plasma membranes. Thus, the expression of these two connexins in SCC was impaired at the post-translation level. Cx31.1 expression was strongly inhibited during all stages of carcinogenesis. Taken together, our results suggest that three different connexin genes are differentially regulated during mouse skin carcinogenesis and the decrease of connexin expression may be an important marker of skin tumor progression.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Langlois, A. C. Maher, J. L. Manias, Q. Shao, G. M. Kidder, and D. W. Laird
Connexin Levels Regulate Keratinocyte Differentiation in the Epidermis
J. Biol. Chem., October 12, 2007; 282(41): 30171 - 30180.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Gen. Virol.Home page
G. H. Ashrafi, J. D. Pitts, A. Faccini, P. McLean, V. O’Brien, M. E. Finbow, and S. Campo
Binding of bovine papillomavirus type 4 E8 to ductin (16K proteolipid), down-regulation of gap junction intercellular communication and full cell transformation are independent events
J. Gen. Virol., March 1, 2000; 81(3): 689 - 694.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
B Risek, A Pozzi, and N. Gilula
Modulation of gap junction expression during transient hyperplasia of rat epidermis
J. Cell Sci., January 5, 1998; 111(10): 1395 - 1404.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.