Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (54)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bond, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Andjelkovich, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bond, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Andjelkovich, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1995 Oxford University Press

research-article

Epidemiological and mechanistic data suggest that 1, 3-butadiene will not be carcinogenic to humans at exposures likely to be encountered in the environment or workplace

James A. Bond 1, Leslie Recio and Dragana Andjelkovich

Chemical Industry Institute of Toxicology 6 Davis Drive, P.O. Box 12137, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed

1, 3-Butadiene (BD) is a carcinogen in both rats and mice with mice being substantially more sensitive than rats. It is not known if BD poses a carcinogenic risk for humans. Findings from exposure assessment studies indicate that potential industrial exposure to BD in monomer, polymer, and end-user industries is typically <2 p.p.m. Epidemiologic studies of persons occupationally exposed to BD are inconclusive. In vitro metabolism of BD in rats, mice and human tissues indicate that there are significant quantitative species differences in the metabolic activation of BD to butadiene monoepoxide (BMO) and butadiene diepoxide (BDE) and the detoxication of BMO. Activation/detoxica-tion ratios calculated using in vitro kinetic constants reveal that ratios in mice were 12-fold greater than rats and humans. In rats and mice exposed to BD, concentrations of BMO in blood and tissues of mice were up to 14-fold higher than in rats and BDE was only detected in mice thereby providing a strong argument for why mice are highly sensitive to BD carcinogenicity. The fact that human tissues do not appear to metabolize BMO to BDE to any significant extent suggest that humans may not be sensitive to BD carcinogenicity. In mice, BDE is a more potent carcinogen than BMO. BDE is mutagenic in vitro at the hprt locus in human TK6 lymphoblasts at concentrations that were 100-fold less than the concentration of BMO required to yield a similar mutation frequency. Importantly, the concentrations of BDE that were genotoxic in vitro are nearly identical to the concentrations of BDE measured in blood and tissues of mice exposed to BD by inhalation. BD is genotoxic in mice, but not rats, following inhalation exposure and this is paralleled by species differences in observed tumor susceptibility. BD is not genotoxic in occupationally-exposed workers. The genetic basis for BD carcinogenicity appears to be primarily through induction of point mutations and deletion events mediated via the potent genotoxic metabolite, BDE. The genotoxic endpoints induced by BDE (e.g., deletion and point mutations) rather than BMO (e.g., point mutations) likely represent the underlying mechanism responsible for the striking species differences observed in the genotoxicity and carcinogenicity of BD in mice versus rats. In summary, the preponderance of evidence which includes both epidemiological and mechanistic data in mice, rats, and humans strongly suggests that BD will not be carcinogenic to humans at occupational or environmental exposures. Any cancer risk assessment for BD should use in vitro human tissue metabolic data and in vitro and in vivo rat data for estimation of human cancer risks.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
S. Z. Abdel-Rahman, M. M. Ammenheuser, and J. B. Ward Jr
Human sensitivity to 1,3-butadiene: role of microsomal epoxide hydrolase polymorphisms
Carcinogenesis, March 1, 2001; 22(3): 415 - 423.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
R.B. Hayes, L. Zhang, S. Yin, J.A. Swenberg, L. Xi, J. Wiencke, W.E. Bechtold, M. Yao, N. Rothman, R. Haas, et al.
Genotoxic markers among butadiene polymer workers in China
Carcinogenesis, January 1, 2000; 21(1): 55 - 62.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
M.n. Murg, M. Schuler, and D.A. Eastmond
Evaluation of micronuclei and chromosomal breakage in the 1cen-q12 region by the butadiene metabolites epoxybutene and diepoxybutane in cultured human lymphocytes
Mutagenesis, November 1, 1999; 14(6): 541 - 546.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Drug Metab. Dispos.Home page
L. A. Buckley, D. P. Coleman, J. P. Burgess, B. F. Thomas, L. T. Burka, and A. R. Jeffcoat
Identification of Urinary Metabolites of Isoprene in Rats and Comparison with Mouse Urinary Metabolites
Drug Metab. Dispos., July 1, 1999; 27(7): 848 - 854.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.