Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (22)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kolaja, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Klaunig, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kolaja, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Klaunig, J. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1996 Oxford University Press

research-article

Selective dieldrin promotion of hepatic focal lesions in mice

Kyte L. Kolaja +, Donald E. Stevenson 1, Earl F. walborg, Jr 1 and James E. Klaunig 2

Division of Toxicology,Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Indiana University School of Medicine indianpolis,IN 46202
1 Dermigen Inc., Smithville,TX,USA

2To whom correspondence should be addressed

Chronic exposure to a number of chlorinated pesticides, including dieldrin, results in an increased and/or multiplicityof hepatocellular neoplasia in mice, with no such effect in similarly treated rats. One possible explanation of this observed selective carcinogenicity is species-spefic hepatic tumor promotion. In the present study we examined the dose-response effect of dieldrin (at several doses) on focal lesion growth (tumor promotion), hepatocyte apoptosis and DNA synthesisin rat and mouse liver. Preneoplastic focal hepatic lesions were produced by diethylnitrosamine (DEN). After the lesionsdeveloped, mice and rats were placed into one of the following dose groups: control (NIH-07 diet) or 0.1, 1.0 or 10.0 mg dieldrin/kg diet. Increased focal lesion, volume, number of foci per liver and focal DNA synthetic labeling indes were observed in 10 mg dieldrin/kg diet-treated mice, but not in similarly treated rats. Dieldrin at dietary concentrations of0.1and 1.0 mg/kg diet produced an increase in the number of preneoplastic lesions (0.1 mg/kg dietat 7 days only) and focal volume (0.1 mg/kg diet at 7 and 30 days, 1.0 mg/kg diet at 30 days), but these concentrations did not increase focal DNA labelling index. At dietary concentrations of 0.1, 1.0 and 10 mg dieldrin/kg diet no siginificant change in lesion percent volume, number of preneoplastic lesions per liver or preneoplastic lesion DNA labeling index was seen in treated ratscompared with control rats. Apoptosis, a form of programed cell death, was notdecreased in foci by any concentration of dieldrin in either rats or mice. Thus our results suggest that dieldrin may function as a mouse-spefic tumor promoter through increased lesion DNA sybthesis.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
J. S. Isenberg, L. M. Kamendulis, D. C. Ackley, J. H. Smith, G. Pugh Jr., A. W. Lington, R. H. McKee, and J. E. Klaunig
Reversibility and Persistence of Di-2-ethylhexyl Phthalate (DEHP)- and Phenobarbital-Induced Hepatocellular Changes in Rodents
Toxicol. Sci., December 1, 2001; 64(2): 192 - 199.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Exp ToxicolHome page
J E Klaunig, L M Kamendulis, and Y. Xu
Epigenetic mechanisms of chemical carcinogenesis
Human and Experimental Toxicology, October 1, 2000; 19(10): 543 - 555.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Exp ToxicolHome page
J Gomes, A H Dawodu, O Lloyd, D M Revitt, and S V Anilal
Hepatic injury and disturbed amino acid metabolism in mice following prolonged exposure to organophosphorus pesticides
Human and Experimental Toxicology, January 1, 1999; 18(1): 33 - 37.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.