© 1996 Oxford University Press
other |
Activation of 4-hydroxytamoxifen and the tamoxifen derivative metabolite E by uterine peroxidase to form DNA adducts: Comparison with DNA adducts formed in the uterus of Sprague-Dawley rats treated with tamoxifen
Brain Tumor Research Center of the Department of Neurological Surgery, Box 0806, University of California San Francisco, CA 94143–0806, USA
1To whom correspondence should be addressed
Daily intraperitoneal treatment of female Sprague-Dawley rats with either 5, 10 or 20 mg/kg tamoxifen (TAM) for 1 weeks increased the level of peroxidase activity in the uterus 2- to 10-fold compared to the control level. Using uterine extracts prepared from control and TAM treated animals, we investigated the activation of 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-HO-TAM) and (E, Z)-1, 2-dipheny-1-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-but-1-ene (cis/trans-metabolite E) to form DNA adducts. Activation of 4-HO-TAM by uterine extracts prepared from either control or TAM-treated rats produced one major (a) and Two minor DNA (b and c) adducts. A similar activation of cis/trans-metabolite E produced two adducts (d and e). There was good correlation between levels of uterine peroxidase activity and levels of DNA adducts formed by 4-HO-TAM and cis/trans-metabolite E. Activation of 4-HO-TAM and cis/trans-metabolite E with horseradish peroxidase (HRP) produced the same adducts as observed by activation with uterine extract Treatment of Sprague-Dawley rats with 5 and 10 mg/kg for 7 days produced eleven DNA adducts in the liver with no adducts detected in the uterus. However, treatment of rats with 20 mg/kg of TAM for 7 days produced the same adduct pattern in the liver and also one major adduct (1) in the uterus with a relative adduct level of 6.4 ±4.1x10–9. Tamoxifen-DNA adduct 1 detected both in the liver and in the uterus of treated rats was similar to adducts produced by activation of 4-HO-TAM with either uterine extract or HRP. The results of these studies suggest a general model whereby the tamoxifen metabolite 4-HO-TAM is further activated in the uterus by peroxidase enzymes to form DNA adducts.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  D. H. Phillips, A. Hewer, M. R. Osborne, K. J. Cole, C. Churchill, and V. M. Arlt Organ specificity of DNA adduct formation by tamoxifen and {alpha}-hydroxytamoxifen in the rat: implications for understanding the mechanism(s) of tamoxifen carcinogenicity and for human risk assessment Mutagenesis, July 1, 2005; 20(4): 297 - 303. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. J. Schild, R. L. Divi, F. A. Beland, M. I. Churchwell, D. R. Doerge, G. Gamboa da Costa, M. M. Marques, and M. C. Poirier Formation of Tamoxifen-DNA Adducts in Multiple Organs of Adult Female Cynomolgus Monkeys Dosed with Tamoxifen for 30 Days Cancer Res., September 15, 2003; 63(18): 5999 - 6003. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. C. Poirier and L. J. Schild The Genotoxicity of Tamoxifen: Extent and Consequences, Kona, Hawaii, January 23, 2003 Mutagenesis, July 1, 2003; 18(4): 395 - 399. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. Gamboa da Costa, L.P. McDaniel-Hamilton, R. H. Heflich, M.M. Marques, and F. A. Beland DNA adduct formation and mutant induction in Sprague-Dawley rats treated with tamoxifen and its derivatives Carcinogenesis, August 1, 2001; 22(8): 1307 - 1315. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. W. Fan and J. L. Bolton Bioactivation of Tamoxifen to Metabolite E Quinone Methide: Reaction with Glutathione and DNA Drug Metab. Dispos., June 1, 2001; 29(6): 891 - 896. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. H. Phillips Understanding the genotoxicity of tamoxifen? Carcinogenesis, June 1, 2001; 22(6): 839 - 849. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. A. Beland, L. P. McDaniel, and M. M. Marques Comparison of the DNA adducts formed by tamoxifen and 4-hydroxytamoxifen in vivo Carcinogenesis, March 1, 1999; 20(3): 471 - 477. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|