Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Patel, H. R.
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, F. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Patel, H. R.
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, F. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Carcinogenesis, Vol 18, 2171-2177, Copyright © 1997 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

Metabolic competence and susceptibility of intestinal epithelium to genotoxic injury during regeneration

HR Patel, A Hewer, DH Phillips, JD Hayes, CR Wolf and FC Campbell
University Department of Surgery, the Medical School, University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK.

The carcinogenic potency of many mutagens is increased in conditions of tissue regeneration. This involves fundamental changes of cellular division and differentiation, in intestinal epithelium. However, effects on epithelial capacity for carcinogen metabolism and susceptibility to genotoxic injury are unknown. Using a novel rat model, this study assessed expression of cytochrome P450 mono- oxygenases (Cyps), glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) and uridine diphosphoglucuronosyl transferase (UGT) in intestinal epithelium during sequential stages of regeneration. Enzyme induction and DNA adduct formation were also assessed after benzo[a]pyrene (BaP) exposure. Control assays were carried out in normal intestinal epithelium. Fewer phase I and II xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes were expressed in regenerating intestinal epithelium than in normal control intestinal epithelium (GSTA3, UGT in regeneration vs Cyp2B, GSTA1/2, GSTA4, GSTP1, UGT in control). Benzo[a]pyrene induced GSTA3 and UGT in regeneration vs Cyp1A, Cyp2B, GSTA1/2, GSTA3, GSTA4, GSTP1 and UGT in control normal intestinal epithelium. Benzo[a]pyrene induced low levels of GSTA3 in early regenerating intestinal epithelium but induction increased by >2- fold at late stage regeneration. Higher levels of benzo[a]pyrene 7,8- diol-9,10-epoxide (BPDE) DNA adducts were formed at early stages of regeneration, than at later stages. Intestinal epithelium displayed reduced metabolic competence and differential susceptibility to genotoxic injury from BaP, during regeneration.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
F. N. C. Gropp, D. L. Greger, C. Morel, S. Sauter, and J. W. Blum
Nuclear receptor and nuclear receptor target gene messenger ribonucleic acid levels at different sites of the gastrointestinal tract and in liver of healthy dogs
J Anim Sci, October 1, 2006; 84(10): 2684 - 2691.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
W. Kosinska, M. d.M. von Pressentin, and J. B. Guttenplan
Mutagenesis induced by benzo[a]pyrene in lacZ mouse mammary and oral tissues: comparisons with mutagenesis in other organs and relationships to previous carcinogenicity assays
Carcinogenesis, June 1, 1999; 20(6): 1103 - 1106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
J. A. Jankowski, N. A. Wright, S. J. Meltzer, G. Triadafilopoulos, K. Geboes, A. G. Casson, D. Kerr, and L. S. Young
Molecular Evolution of the Metaplasia-Dysplasia-Adenocarcinoma Sequence in the Esophagus
Am. J. Pathol., April 1, 1999; 154(4): 965 - 973.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.