Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tagliaferro, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Scott, A. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tagliaferro, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Scott, A. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Carcinogenesis, Vol 18, 2271-2276, Copyright © 1997 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

Cyclic food restriction, insulin and mammary cell proliferation in the rat

AR Tagliaferro, AM Ronan, LD Meeker, HJ Thompson and AL Scott
Department of Animal and Nutritional Sciences, University of New Hampshire, Durham 03824, USA.

We reported recently that weight cycling significantly increased the incidence of mammary cancer in virgin female rats that were pretreated with N-methyl-N-nitrosourea. The present study investigated the effect of weight cycling on mammary epithelial cell proliferation and its relationship to changes in plasma insulin, estrogen, progesterone and urinary corticosterone in 30 female virgin Sprague-Dawley rats. Animals were fed a modified AIN-76A diet containing 24.6% corn oil by weight. Weight-cycled (WC) rats were food restricted daily by either 33% or 50% of non-restricted controls for 1 week followed by 3 weeks compensatory refeeding and weight recovery over 18 weeks or 4.5 weight cycles. WC rats consumed 6-10% less food than controls (P = 0.01) but showed a 71- 89% greater efficiency of food utilization for growth (P < 0.0001) than controls. There were no differences in total weight gain during treatment. Mammary lobuloalveolar and ductal cell proliferation of WC rats, measured by 5-bromo-2'deoxyuridine labelling, increased in a dose- response fashion, P = 0.03, P = 0.06 respectively in comparison to controls. Energy and substrate utilization measured by indirect calorimetry indicated WC animals expended less energy (P = 0.005) and utilized less glucose (P = 0.0001) and protein (P = 0.006) during restriction, and less lipid during recovery (P = 0.05) than controls. There were no significant differences in hormone levels between groups. Multiple regression analysis with plasma insulin, estrogen, progesterone and urinary corticosterone as independent variables (r = 0.947, r2 = 0.897, P = 0.003) showed that plasma insulin was the only significant predictor (P < 0.01) of mammary cell proliferation. In accord with this observation, tyrosine-phosphorylated activation of insulin receptor substrate-1, detected by immunoprecipitation and Western immunoblot analysis in mammary tumors of WC rats from our previous study, was 3-5 times greater than in non-restricted controls (P < 0.01). Present findings suggest that weight cycling in rats increases risk of breast cancer development via insulin stimulated mammary cell proliferation.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
Z. Zhu, W. Jiang, and H. J. Thompson
Effect of energy restriction on tissue size regulation during chemically induced mammary carcinogenesis
Carcinogenesis, September 1, 1999; 20(9): 1721 - 1726.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol PatholHome page
M. A. Moore, H. Tsuda, S. Tamano, A. Hagiwara, K. Imaida, T. Shirai, and N. Ito
Commentary: Marriage of a Medium-Term Liver Model to Surrogate Markers--A Practical Approach for Risk and Benefit Assessment
Toxicol Pathol, March 1, 1999; 27(2): 237 - 242.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.