Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (29)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liu, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Grdina, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Liu, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Grdina, D. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Carcinogenesis, Vol 18, 2457-2459, Copyright © 1997 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

Repression of c-myc gene expression by the thiol and disulfide forms of the cytoprotector amifostine

SC Liu, JS Murley, G Woloschak and DJ Grdina
Center for Mechanistic Biology and Biotechnology, Argonne National Laboratory, IL 60439, USA.

The clinically approved cytoprotector amifostine, designated WR-2721, [S-2-(3-aminopropylamino)ethylphosphorothioic acid], protects against both radiation and drug-induced mutagenesis in animal systems. These effects extend over a wide concentration range making amifostine a strong candidate for evaluation as a possible cancer chemopreventive agent. To better identify and develop potential intermediate biomarkers for chemoprevention at the molecular level we applied the technique of differential display RT-PCR to assess the effects of both the thiol (SH), i.e. WR1065 and the disulfide (SS), i.e. WR-33278, metabolites of amifostine on gene expression in CHO-AA8 cells. Cells were exposed to either 40 microM or 4 mM of each agent for 30 min, and subsequent changes in gene expression were identified and contrasted to that found in corresponding untreated control cells. One band that showed a differential response was sequenced and was found to have 78% homology with a segment of the human pHL-1 cDNA clone contained in GenBank. This clone contains a COX III mitochondrial DNA insert and two exons of human c-myc. Northern blot analyses were performed by using the cloned human c-myc exon 1 probe to confirm whether c-myc gene expression was affected. Repression of c-myc expression was observed under all of the conditions evaluated. An exposure of cells to 40 microM of the disulfide form of amifostine was the most effective in repressing c- myc, i.e. 27% of control level. A concentration of 4 mM of the disulfide form reduced gene expression to 45% of the control level, while the thiol form was less effective, with 4 mM and 40 microM concentrations reducing c-myc gene expression to 65% and 46% of control levels, respectively.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
J. C. Acosta, C. Richard, M. D. Delgado, M. Horita, M. G. Rizzo, J. L. Fernandez-Luna, and J. Leon
Amifostine impairs p53-mediated apoptosis of human myeloid leukemia cells
Mol. Cancer Ther., September 1, 2003; 2(9): 893 - 900.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
O. Pluquet, S. North, A. Bhoumik, K. Dimas, Z.'e. Ronai, and P. Hainaut
The Cytoprotective Aminothiol WR1065 Activates p53 through a Non-genotoxic Signaling Pathway Involving c-Jun N-terminal Kinase
J. Biol. Chem., March 28, 2003; 278(14): 11879 - 11887.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
E. Giannopoulou, P. Katsoris, D. Kardamakis, and E. Papadimitriou
Amifostine Inhibits Angiogenesis in Vivo
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., February 1, 2003; 304(2): 729 - 737.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.