Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (23)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peluso, M.
Right arrow Articles by Parodi, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Peluso, M.
Right arrow Articles by Parodi, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Carcinogenesis, Vol 18, 339-344, Copyright © 1997 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

Detection of DNA adducts in human nasal mucosa tissue by 32P- postlabeling analysis

M Peluso, E Amasio, S Bonassi, A Munnia, F Altrupa and S Parodi
Servizio di Oncologia Sperimentale, Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro, Genoa, Italy.

Nasal epithelium is an easily accessible tissue that is potentially useful for human biomonitoring studies aimed at evaluating exposure to airborne carcinogens. We have devised a simple technique, which causes minimum distress to the informed patient, to obtain very small but sufficient biopsies from the inferior or middle turbinate head. DNA adducts were measured by 32P-postlabeling assay in nasal mucosa of nine cigarette smokers (including two subjects who had given up smoking shortly before sampling), two former smokers and 10 non-smoker healthy donors. None of the subjects reported other recent exposures to mutagens or carcinogens. Using the nuclease P1 technique, a mean adduct level of 4.8/10(8) bases and a specific spot pattern, the diagonal radioactive zone, were found in smokers, whereas non-smokers showed a significantly lower global level of DNA adducts, i.e. 1.4/10(8) bases, and no diagonal zone. Another important result was the presence of a significant association between DNA adduct level and the number of cigarettes smoked daily. These preliminary findings suggest that the level of DNA adducts measured from biopsies of the nasal mucosa is a reliable marker of exposure to cigarette smoking and uphold its use in biomonitoring exposures to other airborne DNA binding compounds.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
M. Peluso, M. Neri, G. Margarino, C. Mereu, A. Munnia, M. Ceppi, M. Buratti, R. Felletti, F. Stea, R. Quaglia, et al.
Comparison of DNA adduct levels in nasal mucosa, lymphocytes and bronchial mucosa of cigarette smokers and interaction with metabolic gene polymorphisms
Carcinogenesis, December 1, 2004; 25(12): 2459 - 2465.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
D. H. Phillips
Smoking-related DNA and protein adducts in human tissues
Carcinogenesis, December 1, 2002; 23(12): 1979 - 2004.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
G. Matullo, D. Palli, M. Peluso, S. Guarrera, S. Carturan, E. Celentano, V. Krogh, A. Munnia, R. Tumino, S. Polidoro, et al.
XRCC1, XRCC3, XPD gene polymorphisms, smoking and 32P-DNA adducts in a sample of healthy subjects
Carcinogenesis, September 1, 2001; 22(9): 1437 - 1445.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
G. Romano, A. Sgambato, A. Boninsegna, G. Flamini, G. Curigliano, Q. Yang, V. La Gioia, C. Signorelli, A. Ferro, G. Capelli, et al.
Evaluation of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon-DNA Adducts in Exfoliated Oral Cells by an Immunohistochemical Assay
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 1999; 8(1): 91 - 96.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.