Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Frandsen, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Frandsen, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Carcinogenesis, Vol 18, 1555-1560, Copyright © 1997 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

Excretion of DNA adducts of 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5- b]pyridine and 2-amino-3,4,8-trimethylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoxaline, PhIP- dG, PhIP-DNA and DiMeIQx-DNA from the rat

H Frandsen
Institute of Toxicology, National Food Agency, Soborg, Denmark.

The heterocyclic aromatic amines, 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5- b]pyridine (PhIP) and 2-amino-3,4,8-trimethylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoxaline (4,8-DiMeIQx) are formed during frying of meat. PhIP and 4,8-DiMeIQx have, after metabolic activation, been shown to form adducts with DNA at the C8 of guanine both in vitro and in vivo. In order to investigate possible urinary biomarkers for estimation of the genotoxic dose of PhIP and 4,8-DiMeIQx, [3H]PhIP-dG, [3H]PhIP-DNA and [14C]4,8-DiMeIQx- DNA were injected i.p. to rats and the excretion of radioactivity in urine and faeces were measured. For all three [3H]PhIP-dG, [3H]PhIP-DNA and [14C]4,8-DiMeIQx-DNA 15-20% of the dose were excreted in the urine and 80-85% of the dose were excreted in the faeces. Urinary excretion showed maximum to 24 h (90%) with a rapid decline, 10% to 48 h and 0% to 72 h. Faecal excretion also showed maximum to 24 h (60%) with a slower decline, 30% to 48 h and 10% to 72 h. HPLC analysis of samples of urine and extracts from faeces, from rats dosed with [3H]PhIP-dG, showed that approximately 90% of the radioactivity co-eluted with PhIP- dG, indicating that PhIP-dG is excreted unmetabolized. HPLC analysis of samples of urine and extracts from faeces, from rats dosed with [3H]PhIP-DNA, showed that approximately 85% of the radioactivity co- eluted with PhIP-dG, indicating that PhIP-DNA adducts is mainly excreted as nucleoside adducts. Approximately 5% of the radioactivity excreted in the urine co-eluted with PhIP-G, indicating loss of deoxyribose. HPLC analysis of samples of urine and extracts from faeces, from rats dosed with [14C]4,8-DiMeIQx-DNA, showed that approximately 90% of the radioactivity co-eluted with 4,8-DiMeIQx-dG, indicating that 4,8-DiMeIQx-DNA adducts is mainly excreted as nucleoside adducts. Man is able to eliminate compounds of a higher mol. wt in the urine than the rat, the percentage of PhIP-dG and 4,8-DiMeIQx eliminated in the urine of man would therefore be expected to be higher than in the rat. Measurement of urinary nucleoside adducts of PhIP and 4,8-DiMeIQx could therefore provide a basis for the development of a biomonitoring strategy for the genotoxic dose of these food derived HAA.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
M. Fang, R. J. Edwards, M. Bartlet-Jones, G. W. Taylor, S. Murray, and A. R. Boobis
Urinary N2-(2'-deoxyguanosin-8-yl)PhIP as a biomarker for PhIP exposure
Carcinogenesis, June 1, 2004; 25(6): 1053 - 1062.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
J. R. Bacon, G. Williamson, R. C. Garner, G. Lappin, S. Langouet, and Y. Bao
Sulforaphane and quercetin modulate PhIP-DNA adduct formation in human HepG2 cells and hepatocytes
Carcinogenesis, December 1, 2003; 24(12): 1903 - 1911.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Exp ToxicolHome page
Proceedings of the British Toxicology Society Annual Congress University of Surrey, Guildford 19 - 22 April 1998
Human and Experimental Toxicology, September 1, 1998; 17(9): 469 - 534.
[PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.