Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (23)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kozack, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Loechler, E. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kozack, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Loechler, E. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Carcinogenesis, Vol 18, 1585-1593, Copyright © 1997 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

Molecular modeling of the conformational complexity of (+)-anti-B[a]PDE- adducted DNA using simulated annealing

RE Kozack and EL Loechler
Department of Biology, Boston University, MA 02215, USA.

Benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P), a potent mutagen/carcinogen, reacts with DNA following metabolism to its corresponding (+)-anti-7,8-diol-9,10- epoxide [(+)-anti-B[a]PDE], giving a major adduct (+)-trans-anti-B[a]P- N2-dG. Evidence suggests that this adduct is responsible for most of the different kinds of mutations (e.g. G-->T, G-->A, etc.) induced by (+)-anti-B[a]PDE, raising the question of how can a single adduct cause many different kinds of mutations? One hypothesis is that different mutations are induced depending upon the conformation of this adduct when bypassed during DNA replication. If true, then it becomes imperative to explore different reasonable conformations for this adduct. Herein a simulated annealing protocol is employed to study the conformation of (+)-trans-anti-B[a]P-N2-dG with the B[a]P moiety in the minor groove and pointing toward the base on its 5'-side in a 5'-CGC-3' sequence context in duplex DNA. This conformation and sequence were chosen because there is a structure derived from NMR constraints for comparison. A four step procedure is followed: the adduct is docked in canonical B-DNA, after which the structure is subjected to an initial conjugate gradient minimization, followed by simulated annealing and a final conjugate gradient minimization. The quality and final energy of structures is assessed as a function of changes in six parameters, including the length of the DNA helix, the initial annealing temperature (T0), the annealing time (t), the molecular dynamics time step (tau) and two other parameters. While there is no single set of optimum parameters, reasonable low energy structures were obtained using the values t approximately 40 ps (or longer), T0 approximately 750 K and tau approximately 1.0 fs with a helix length of 7 bp. The structures that emerge all retain the basic features of the input structure, being B-DNA-like with the B[a]P moiety in the minor groove pointing toward the base on the 5'-side. However, within this broad category there are at least six subclasses of structures, of which four have lowest energy members that differ by < approximately 5 kcal/mol. The fact that a variety of distinct but related structures emerge from a single starting structure as this parameter set is varied suggests that the use of a large but manageable number of simulated annealing runs should be considered in the search for a cohort of related structures. This is especially important given that this breadth of potentially relevant structures of approximately the same energy may indeed be relevant to the hypothesis that different mutations arise from a single adduct in different conformations.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
A. Besaratinia and G. P. Pfeifer
Enhancement of the Mutagenicity of Benzo(a)pyrene Diol Epoxide by a Nonmutagenic Dose of Ultraviolet A Radiation
Cancer Res., December 15, 2003; 63(24): 8708 - 8716.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
A. B. Guliaev, J. Sagi, and B. Singer
Sequence-dependent conformational perturbation in DNA duplexes containing an {epsilon}AT mismatch using molecular dynamics simulation
Carcinogenesis, September 1, 2000; 21(9): 1727 - 1736.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
E. D. Scheeff, J. M. Briggs, and S. B. Howell
Molecular Modeling of the Intrastrand Guanine-Guanine DNA Adducts Produced by Cisplatin and Oxaliplatin
Mol. Pharmacol., September 1, 1999; 56(3): 633 - 643.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
R. E. Kozack and E. L. Loechler
Molecular modeling of the major adduct of (+)-anti-B[a]PDE (N2-dG) in the eight conformations and the five DNA sequences most relevant to base substitution mutagenesis
Carcinogenesis, January 1, 1999; 20(1): 85 - 94.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
R. E. Kozack, R. Shukla, and E. L. Loechler
A hypothesis for what conformation of the major adduct of (+)-anti-B[a]PDE (N2-dG) causes G->T versus G->A mutations based upon a correlation between mutagenesis and molecular modeling results
Carcinogenesis, January 1, 1999; 20(1): 95 - 102.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.