Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Templin, M. V.
Right arrow Articles by Butterworth, B. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Templin, M. V.
Right arrow Articles by Butterworth, B. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Carcinogenesis, Vol 19, 187-193, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

Patterns of chloroform-induced regenerative cell proliferation in BDF1 mice correlate with organ specificity and dose-response of tumor formation

MV Templin, AA Constan, DC Wolf, BA Wong and BE Butterworth
Chemical Industry Institute of Toxicology, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2137, USA.

It has been reported that chloroform administered to BDF1 mice by inhalation for 2 years at concentrations of 5, 30 or 90 p.p.m. for 6 h/day, 5 days/week induced an increase in renal cell tumors in male but not female mice exposed to the doses of 30 and 90 p.p.m. A small increase in liver tumors was statistically significant in the female mice at 90 p.p.m. if the incidences of carcinomas and adenomas were combined. Because chloroform is not a DNA reactive mutagen, a 13-week time-course and dose-response study was conducted under conditions of the original bioassay to examine whether regenerative cell proliferation was an underlying mechanism of carcinogenesis. Mice were given bromodeoxyuridine via infusion during the last 3.5 days prior to necropsy to label cells in S-phase. Chloroform induced pathology and regenerative cell proliferation, measured as the labeling index (LI, percentage of cells in S-phase), were assessed microscopically and immunohistochemically. Male mice exposed to 30 and 90 p.p.m. exhibited a dose-dependent increase in regenerating tubules within the renal cortex and up to a 31-fold increase in LI. No renal lesions or increased LI were observed in females. Increased centrilobular to midzonal hepatocyte degeneration and vacuolation and a 7-fold increase over controls in the hepatocyte LI were observed in the female mice at 90 p.p.m. at 13 weeks. Males exhibited similar pathology, but the increase in LI was not sustained. The observed correlations between cytolethality and regenerative cell proliferation with tumor formation supports extensive evidence that chloroform induces cancer via a non- genotoxic-cytotoxic mode of action. A concentration of 5 p.p.m. is the no-observed-adverse-effect level for nephrotoxicity, cell proliferation and cancer. An appropriate safety factor applied to this value is a straightforward approach to cancer risk assessment that is consistent with the mode of action of chloroform.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
Y.-M. Tan, B. E. Butterworth, M. L. Gargas, and R. B. Conolly
Biologically Motivated Computational Modeling of Chloroform Cytolethality and Regenerative Cellular Proliferation
Toxicol. Sci., September 1, 2003; 75(1): 192 - 200.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
A. A. Constan, B. A. Wong, J. I. Everitt, and B. E. Butterworth
Chloroform Inhalation Exposure Conditions Necessary to Initiate Liver Toxicity in Female B6C3F1 Mice
Toxicol. Sci., April 1, 2002; 66(2): 201 - 208.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.