Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (26)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dosch, J.
Right arrow Articles by Kaina, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dosch, J.
Right arrow Articles by Kaina, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Carcinogenesis, Vol 19, 567-573, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

Mismatch G-T binding activity and MSH2 expression is quantitatively related to sensitivity of cells to methylating agents

J Dosch, M Christmann and B Kaina
Division of Applied Toxicology, Institute of Toxicology, University of Mainz, Germany.

To elucidate mechanisms involved in alkylating drug resistance, Chinese hamster cells resistant to methylating agents have been generated upon transfection with human DNA. Here it is shown that these Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) variants exhibit the tolerance phenotype: they are alkyltransferase deficient (Mex-), cross-resistant to 6-thioguanine, exhibit reduced G-T binding (MutS alpha) activity and express the mismatch repair protein MSH2 at a significantly lower level than the corresponding control. By comparing wild-type cells with different tolerant strains that show gradual differences in resistance to methylating agents, it was shown that both the G-T binding activity and the amount of MSH2 protein inversely correlates with the level of methylating drug resistance. Although the tolerant cell variants analysed express MSH2 at a significantly lower level than the wild- type, MSH2 mRNA expression was not impaired. Furthermore, MSH2 promoter activity was not reduced upon transient transfection into tolerant cells. The results indicate that quantitative differences in expression of components of mismatch repair do exist in mammalian cells that affect cell survival upon methylation. It appears that post- transcriptional mechanisms are involved in regulation of MSH2 expression.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
A. G. Schroering, A. Kothandapani, S. M. Patrick, S. Kaliyaperumal, V. P. Sharma, and K. J. Williams
Prolonged Cell Cycle Response of HeLa Cells to Low-Level Alkylation Exposure
Cancer Res., August 1, 2009; 69(15): 6307 - 6314.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
J. Bohon and C. R. de los Santos
Structural effect of the anticancer agent 6-thioguanine on duplex DNA
Nucleic Acids Res., February 15, 2003; 31(4): 1331 - 1338.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
R. Pepponi, G. Marra, M. P. Fuggetta, S. Falcinelli, E. Pagani, E. Bonmassar, J. Jiricny, and S. D'Atri
The Effect of O6-Alkylguanine-DNA Alkyltransferase and Mismatch Repair Activities on the Sensitivity of Human Melanoma Cells to Temozolomide, 1,3-bis(2-Chloroethyl)1-nitrosourea, and Cisplatin
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., February 1, 2003; 304(2): 661 - 668.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
A. Abuin, H. Zhang, and A. Bradley
Genetic Analysis of Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells Bearing Msh3 and Msh2 Single and Compound Mutations
Mol. Cell. Biol., January 1, 2000; 20(1): 149 - 157.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.