Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yu, F. L.
Right arrow Articles by Wang, M. Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yu, F. L.
Right arrow Articles by Wang, M. Y.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Carcinogenesis, Vol 19, 1127-1132, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press

ARTICLES

The transcriptional effects and DNA-binding specificities of 17beta- estradiol after dimethyldioxirane activation

FL Yu, W Bender, WY Zheng and MY Wang
Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Illinois, College of Medicine at Rockford, 61107, USA.

It was found recently that 17beta-estradiol (E2) could be activated by the epoxide-forming oxidant dimethyldioxirane (DMDO) resulting in the inhibition of rat liver nuclear and nucleolar RNA synthesis in vitro (Carcinogenesis, 17, 1957-1961, 1996). To further study the mechanism of this inhibition, several synthetic DNAs with different base content and sequence were used to study the transcriptional effects and binding specificities of E2 after DMDO activation in vitro. The results show: (1) E2 after activation had a strong inhibitory effect on the template function of both A-T and G-C containing double-stranded DNAs, e.g. poly[d(A-T)], polydG x polydC and poly[d(I-C)], and only a weak inhibition on the single-stranded DNA template, polydC. The inhibition was dose-dependent, and only after DMDO activation. (2) 3H-labeled E2, after DMDO activation, was able to bind DNAs containing both A-T and G- C bases. The order of the binding preference was: calf thymus DNA > poly[d(A-T)] > poly[d(G-C)]. (3) The covalent binding nature of E2 to DNA after activation was further confirmed by 32P-post-labeling analysis using calf thymus DNA. (4) The absorption spectrum of E2 changed, after DMDO treatment, from a peak around 280-290 nm to 260-270 nm with a shoulder appearing around 300-320 nm. These studies have not only confirmed our earlier observation that E2, after DMDO activation, can inhibit DNA-dependent RNA synthesis, but also provided new insights into the DNA-binding properties after activation. Additionally, since epoxidation is often required for the activation of chemical carcinogens to bind DNA, these studies lend further support to our proposed hypothesis that E2 epoxidation may play an initiation role in estrogen carcinogenesis.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 CarcinogenesisHome page
B. Xie, S.W. Tsao, and Y.C. Wong
Sex hormone-induced mammary carcinogenesis in female Noble rats: the role of androgens
Carcinogenesis, August 1, 1999; 20(8): 1597 - 1606.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.