Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (31)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shiao, Y. H.
Right arrow Articles by Kasprzak, K. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shiao, Y. H.
Right arrow Articles by Kasprzak, K. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Carcinogenesis, Vol 19, 1203-1207, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

Cell cycle arrest, apoptosis and p53 expression in nickel(II) acetate- treated Chinese hamster ovary cells

YH Shiao, SH Lee and KS Kasprzak
Laboratory of Comparative Carcinogenesis, NCI-FCRDC, NIH, Frederick, MD 21702, USA. shiao@ncifcrf.gov

Nickel(II) compounds are known human and animal carcinogens. In this study, the effects of nickel(II) acetate on cell cycle, apoptosis and p53 expression were investigated in order to unveil the elements of early cellular responses to the metal. Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells were grown for 72 h in Ham's F-12 medium containing 0, 40, 80, 160, 240, 320, 480 or 640 microM nickel(II) acetate. DNA fragmentation, representative of apoptosis, was examined by agarose gel electrophoresis. The distribution of cells among various phases of cell cycle was determined by DNA flow cytometry. Expression of p53 protein was measured by the Western blotting technique. DNA fragmentation was detectable in cells treated with > or = 160 microM nickel(II) and its intensity increased with increasing nickel(II) concentration. The proportion of cells at S phase declined in a nickel(II) concentration- dependent manner. The decline was accompanied by an increase of cell proportion in G2/M phase and the increase became statistically significant in cells exposed to at least 480 microM nickel(II). Expression of p53 protein was not different from that in the control among samples treated with < or = 480 microM nickel(II). However, an extra fraction that migrated close to the p53 protein fraction was detected in cells treated with 640 microM nickel(II). Our findings suggest that nickel(II) modulates cellular response through effectors involved in both G2/M arrest and apoptosis regulatory pathways. The proportion of cells arrested at G2/M phase or undergoing apoptosis depends directly on nickel(II) concentration. High concentration of nickel(II) appears to up-regulate protein(s) other than the common form of p53 protein.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
J. Ding, G. He, W. Gong, W. Wen, W. Sun, B. Ning, S. Huang, K. Wu, C. Huang, M. Wu, et al.
Effects of Nickel on Cyclin Expression, Cell Cycle Progression and Cell Proliferation in Human Pulmonary Cells
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., June 1, 2009; 18(6): 1720 - 1729.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol Ind HealthHome page
D. P Arfsten, K. R Still, and G. D Ritchie
A review of the effects of uranium and depleted uranium exposure on reproduction and fetal development
Toxicology and Industrial Health, June 1, 2001; 17(5-10): 180 - 191.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
K. Salnikow, W. G. An, G. Melillo, M. V. Blagosklonny, and M. Costa
Nickel-induced transformation shifts the balance between HIF-1 and p53 transcription factors
Carcinogenesis, September 1, 1999; 20(9): 1819 - 1823.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.