Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (23)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lubet, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Grubbs, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lubet, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Grubbs, C. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Carcinogenesis, Vol 19, 1345-1351, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

Chemopreventive effects of the aromatase inhibitor vorozole (R 83842) in the methylnitrosourea-induced mammary cancer model

RA Lubet, VE Steele, R DeCoster, C Bowden, M You, MM Juliana, I Eto, GJ Kelloff and CJ Grubbs
NCI-DCP, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. lubetr@dcpcepn.nci.nih.gov

The chemopreventive activity of the highly specific nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor, vorozole, was examined in the methylnitrosourea (MNU)-induced rat model of mammary carcinogenesis. Various doses of vorozole (0.08-1.25 mg/kg body wt/day) were administered daily (by gavage) to female Sprague-Dawley rats starting at 43 days of age. Seven days later, the rats were given a single i.v. dose of MNU (50 mg/kg body wt). Rats were continually treated with vorozole until the end of the experiment (120 days post-MNU). Vorozole caused a dose dependent inhibition of mammary cancer multiplicity. The highest dose of vorozole (1.25 mg/kg body wt/day) decreased cancer multiplicity by approximately 90%, and simultaneously decreased cancer incidence from 100 to 44%. The next two highest doses of vorozole (0.63 and 0.31 mg/kg body wt/day) inhibited MNU-induced mammary cancer multiplicity by 70-80%. Even the two lowest doses of vorozole (0.16 and 0.08 mg/kg body wt/ day) decreased cancer multiplicity -50%. Serum level determinations were performed on a variety of endpoints at either 4 or 24 h following the last dose of vorozole. Insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1 levels were slightly, but significantly, increased by vorozole treatment. Vorozole induced striking increases in serum testosterone levels at 4 h at all the dose levels employed. Testosterone levels were significantly elevated over controls at 24 h in rats given the lower doses of vorozole (0.08-0.31 mg/kg body wt/day), but were significantly lower than in rats administered the higher doses of vorozole (0.63 or 1.25 mg/kg body wt/ day). This result presumably reflects the limited half- life of vorozole in rats. In a second series of experiments, the effects of limited duration of dosing with vorozole (2.5 mg/kg body wt/day) or intermittent dosing with vorozole were determined. Treatment of rats with vorozole for limited time periods, from 3 days post-MNU administration until 30 or 60 days post-MNU treatment, resulted in significant delays in the time to appearance of palpable cancers. However, these limited treatments did not greatly affect the overall incidence or multiplicity of mammary cancers when compared with the MNU controls at the end of the study (150 days post-MNU). Finally, the effects of intermittent dosing with vorozole (2.5 mg/kg body wt/day) were examined. Rats were administered cycles of vorozole daily for a period of 3 weeks followed by treatment with the vorozole vehicle for the next 3 weeks (total of four cycles). Although this intermittent treatment did inhibit the appearance of new tumors during each of the periods that vorozole was administered, it did not cause regression of palpable cancers.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Prevention ResearchHome page
R. A. Lubet, D. Boring, V. E. Steele, J. M. Ruppert, M. M. Juliana, and C. J. Grubbs
Lack of Efficacy of the Statins Atorvastatin and Lovastatin in Rodent Mammary Carcinogenesis
Cancer Prevention Research, February 1, 2009; 2(2): 161 - 167.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
K. Christov, C. J. Grubbs, A. Shilkaitis, M. M. Juliana, and R. A. Lubet
Short-term Modulation of Cell Proliferation and Apoptosis and Preventive/Therapeutic Efficacy of Various Agents in a Mammary Cancer Model
Clin. Cancer Res., September 15, 2007; 13(18): 5488 - 5496.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
R. Yao, Y. Wang, Y. Lu, W. J. Lemon, D. W. End, C. J. Grubbs, R. A. Lubet, and M. You
Efficacy of the farnesyltransferase inhibitor R115777 in a rat mammary tumor model: role of Ha-ras mutations and use of microarray analysis in identifying potential targets
Carcinogenesis, July 1, 2006; 27(7): 1420 - 1431.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
C. J. Grubbs, R. A. Lubet, V. R. Atigadda, K. Christov, A. M. Deshpande, V. Tirmal, G. Xia, K. I. Bland, I. Eto, W. J. Brouillette, et al.
Efficacy of new retinoids in the prevention of mammary cancers and correlations with short-term biomarkers
Carcinogenesis, June 1, 2006; 27(6): 1232 - 1239.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
R. A. Lubet, K. Christov, M. You, R. Yao, V. E. Steele, D. W. End, M. M. Juliana, and C. J. Grubbs
Effects of the farnesyl transferase inhibitor R115777 (Zarnestra) on mammary carcinogenesis: prevention, therapy, and role of HaRas mutations.
Mol. Cancer Ther., April 1, 2006; 5(4): 1073 - 1078.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
R. A. Lubet, K. Christov, N. P. Nunez, S. D. Hursting, V. E. Steele, M.M. Juliana, I. Eto, and C. J. Grubbs
Efficacy of Targretin on methylnitrosourea-induced mammary cancers: prevention and therapy dose-response curves and effects on proliferation and apoptosis
Carcinogenesis, February 1, 2005; 26(2): 441 - 448.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
B. J Grube, E. T. Eng, Y.-C. Kao, A. Kwon, and S. Chen
White Button Mushroom Phytochemicals Inhibit Aromatase Activity and Breast Cancer Cell Proliferation
J. Nutr., December 1, 2001; 131(12): 3288 - 3293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
J. E. Green, M.-A. Shibata, E. Shibata, R. C. Moon, M. R. Anver, G. Kelloff, and R. Lubet
2-Difluoromethylornithine and Dehydroepiandrosterone Inhibit Mammary Tumor Progression but not Mammary or Prostate Tumor Initiation in C3(1)/SV40 T/t-antigen Transgenic Mice
Cancer Res., October 1, 2001; 61(20): 7449 - 7455.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cell Growth Differ.Home page
A. Shilkaitis, J. Graves, R. R. Mehta, L. Hu, M. You, R. Lubet, V. Steele, G. Kelloff, and K. Christov
Bcl-2 and Bax Are Differentially Expressed in Hyperplastic, Premalignant, and Malignant Lesions of Mammary Carcinogenesis
Cell Growth Differ., August 1, 2000; 11(8): 437 - 445.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
K. P. Nephew, E. Osborne, R. A. Lubet, C. J. Grubbs, and S. A. Khan
Effects of Oral Administration of Tamoxifen, Toremifene, Dehydroepiandrosterone, and Vorozole on Uterine Histomorphology in the Rat
Experimental Biology and Medicine, March 1, 2000; 223(3): 288 - 294.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.