Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (41)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kitano, M.
Right arrow Articles by Fukushima, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kitano, M.
Right arrow Articles by Fukushima, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Carcinogenesis, Vol 19, 1475-1480, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

Presence of a threshold for promoting effects of phenobarbital on diethylnitrosamine-induced hepatic foci in the rat

M Kitano, T Ichihara, T Matsuda, H Wanibuchi, S Tamano, A Hagiwara, S Imaoka, Y Funae, T Shirai and S Fukushima
First Department of Pathology, Osaka City University Medical School, Osaka, Japan.

The dose dependence of the hepatopromoting effects of phenobarbital (PB) was investigated in a rat liver medium-term bioassay (Ito test) to elucidate a practical threshold level. F344 rats were given a single i.p. injection of diethylnitrosamine (200 mg/kg body wt) and subjected to two-thirds partial hepatectomy at week 3. Commencing 2 weeks from the start, PB at doses of 0, 1, 2, 4, 7.5, 15 or 500 p.p.m. in experiment 1 and 0, 0.01, 0.1 or 0.5 p.p.m. in experiment 2 were fed to the rats for 6 weeks. Experiment 3 was conducted to confirm previous data using the same medium-term bioassay, with PB at doses of 0, 1, 2, 4, 7.5, 15, 30, 60, 125, 250 or 500 p.p.m. fed to the rats. All surviving animals were killed at week 8 in these experiments and their livers were immunohistochemically examined for expression of glutathione S-transferase placental form (GST-P). Quantitative values for GST-P-positive foci in the liver were increased dose dependently in rats given 60-500 p.p.m. PB. However, those for doses in the range 1- 7.5 p.p.m. demonstrated a decrease as compared with the control group (0 p.p.m.), with significant differences observed for 1 and 2 p.p.m.. The results for 15-30 and 0.01-0.5 p.p.m. were comparable with the control values. Examination of transforming growth factor-alpha (TGF- alpha)-positive foci also produced similar results to those for GST-P in experiment 1. Immunohistochemical staining of TGF-alpha and GST-P using serial liver sections demonstrated that the TGF-alpha-positive foci comprised a sub-population of the GST-P-positive lesions, being approximately 1/8-1/10th as common in livers of animals treated with PB. TGF-alpha-positive foci were almost always negative on immunostaining for TGF-beta. Western blotting for proteins CYP2B1, 2C6 and 3A2 revealed a good correlation between changes in GST-P-positive foci and CYP3A2 protein expression. The finding of inhibition effects at low doses of PB confirms the presence of a threshold level for promoting effects by PB on liver carcinogenesis in rats.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
S. Fukushima, A. Kinoshita, R. Puatanachokchai, M. Kushida, H. Wanibuchi, and K. Morimura
Hormesis and dose-response-mediated mechanisms in carcinogenesis: evidence for a threshold in carcinogenicity of non-genotoxic carcinogens
Carcinogenesis, November 1, 2005; 26(11): 1835 - 1845.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
M. Hoshi, K. Morimura, H. Wanibuchi, M. Wei, E. Okochi, T. Ushijima, K. Takaoka, and S. Fukushima
No-Observed Effect Levels for Carcinogenicity and for in vivo Mutagenicity of a Genotoxic Carcinogen
Toxicol. Sci., October 1, 2004; 81(2): 273 - 279.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
M. Kagawa, T. Sano, N. Ishibashi, M. Hashimoto, M. Okuno, H. Moriwaki, R. Suzuki, H. Kohno, and T. Tanaka
An acyclic retinoid, NIK-333, inhibits N-diethylnitrosamine-induced rat hepatocarcinogenesis through suppression of TGF-{alpha} expression and cell proliferation
Carcinogenesis, June 1, 2004; 25(6): 979 - 985.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
A. Kinoshita, H. Wanibuchi, K. Morimura, M. Wei, J. Shen, S. Imaoka, Y. Funae, and S. Fukushima
Phenobarbital at low dose exerts hormesis in rat hepatocarcinogenesis by reducing oxidative DNA damage, altering cell proliferation, apoptosis and gene expression
Carcinogenesis, August 1, 2003; 24(8): 1389 - 1399.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol PatholHome page
H. Tsuda, S. Fukushima, H. Wanibuchi, K. Morimura, D. Nakae, K. Imaida, M. Tatematsu, M. Hirose, K. Wakabayashi, and M. A. Moore
Value of GST-P Positive Preneoplastic Hepatic Foci in Dose-Response Studies of Hepatocarcinogenesis: Evidence for Practical Thresholds with Both Genotoxic and Nongenotoxic Carcinogens. A Review of Recent Work
Toxicol Pathol, January 1, 2003; 31(1): 80 - 86.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
M. Shibutani, N. Takahashi, T. Kobayashi, C. Uneyama, N. Masutomi, A. Nishikawa, and M. Hirose
Molecular profiling of genes up-regulated during promotion by phenobarbital treatment in a medium-term rat liver bioassay
Carcinogenesis, June 1, 2002; 23(6): 1047 - 1055.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
D. L. Gustafson, M. E. Long, R. S. Thomas, S. A. Benjamin, and R. S. H. Yang
Comparative Hepatocarcinogenicity of Hexachlorobenzene, Pentachlorobenzene, 1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene, and 1,4-Dichlorobenzene: Application of a Medium-Term Liver Focus Bioassay and Molecular and Cellular Indices
Toxicol. Sci., February 1, 2000; 53(2): 245 - 252.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.