Carcinogenesis, Vol 19, 1623-1629, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press
NM Brown, PA Manzolillo, JX Zhang, J Wang and CA Lamartiniere
Prenatal exposure to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) was
investigated for its potential to predispose to breast cancer. Analysis of
mammary gland differentiation and cell proliferation were used as
biomarkers. Timed pregnant Sprague-Dawley CD rats were gavaged with 1
microg TCDD/kg on day 15 post-conception. Control animals were treated with
the same volume of vehicle (sesame oil) on the same schedule. Mammary gland
differentiation studies revealed that prenatal TCDD treatment, as compared
with sesame oil treatment, resulted in significantly more terminal end buds
and fewer lobules II in 50-day-old offspring, but no significant
alterations to mammary gland differentiation in 21-day-old offspring.
Terminal end buds are the most susceptible terminal ductal structures and
lobules the least susceptible to carcinogenesis. Prenatal TCDD treatment
did not alter labeling index in the mammary terminal ductal structures of
21- and 50- day-old rats, but the total proliferative compartment in
terminal end buds of 50-day-old rats was larger. Prenatal TCDD treatment
resulted in an increased number of chemically induced mammary
adenocarcinomas in rats. TCDD delayed time of vaginal opening and caused
disruption to the estrous cycle. Alteration to mammary gland
differentiation (increased number of terminal end buds) is correlated with
increased susceptibility to mammary cancer from prenatal exposure to TCDD.
ARTICLES
Prenatal TCDD and predisposition to mammary cancer in the rat
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, UAB Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 35294, USA.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Diamanti-Kandarakis, J.-P. Bourguignon, L. C. Giudice, R. Hauser, G. S. Prins, A. M. Soto, R. T. Zoeller, and A. C. Gore Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals: An Endocrine Society Scientific Statement Endocr. Rev., June 1, 2009; 30(4): 293 - 342. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Buteau-Lozano, G. Velasco, M. Cristofari, P. Balaguer, and M. Perrot-Applanat Xenoestrogens modulate vascular endothelial growth factor secretion in breast cancer cells through an estrogen receptor-dependent mechanism J. Endocrinol., February 1, 2008; 196(2): 399 - 412. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. L. Hsu, D. Yoon, H. H. Choi, F. Wang, R. T. Taylor, N. Chen, R. Zhang, and O. Hankinson A Proposed Mechanism for the Protective Effect of Dioxin against Breast Cancer Toxicol. Sci., August 1, 2007; 98(2): 436 - 444. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Shi, K. E. Valdez, A. Y. Ting, A. Franczak, S. L. Gum, and B. K. Petroff Ovarian Endocrine Disruption Underlies Premature Reproductive Senescence Following Environmentally Relevant Chronic Exposure to the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Agonist 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-Dioxin Biol Reprod, February 1, 2007; 76(2): 198 - 202. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. E. Fenton Endocrine-Disrupting Compounds and Mammary Gland Development: Early Exposure and Later Life Consequences Endocrinology, June 1, 2006; 147(6): s18 - s24. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. R. Boverhof, J. C. Kwekel, D. G. Humes, L. D. Burgoon, and T. R. Zacharewski Dioxin Induces an Estrogen-Like, Estrogen Receptor-Dependent Gene Expression Response in the Murine Uterus Mol. Pharmacol., May 1, 2006; 69(5): 1599 - 1606. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Baba, J. Mimura, N. Nakamura, N. Harada, M. Yamamoto, K.-i. Morohashi, and Y. Fujii-Kuriyama Intrinsic Function of the Aryl Hydrocarbon (Dioxin) Receptor as a Key Factor in Female Reproduction Mol. Cell. Biol., November 15, 2005; 25(22): 10040 - 10051. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H Watanabe, A Suzuki, M Goto, S Ohsako, C Tohyama, H Handa, and T Iguchi Comparative uterine gene expression analysis after dioxin and estradiol administration J. Mol. Endocrinol., December 1, 2004; 33(3): 763 - 771. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Larsen, P. B. Brake, R. S. Pollenz, and C. R. Jefcoate Linked Expression of Ah Receptor, ARNT, CYP1A1, and CYP1B1 in Rat Mammary Epithelia, in Vitro, Is Each Substantially Elevated by Specific Extracellular Matrix Interactions that Precede Branching Morphogenesis Toxicol. Sci., November 1, 2004; 82(1): 46 - 61. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. A. Vorderstrasse, S. E. Fenton, A. A. Bohn, J. A. Cundiff, and B. P. Lawrence A Novel Effect of Dioxin: Exposure during Pregnancy Severely Impairs Mammary Gland Differentiation Toxicol. Sci., April 1, 2004; 78(2): 248 - 257. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. G. Foster, E. V. Younglai, O. Boutross-Tadross, C. L. Hughes, and M. G. Wade Mammary Gland Morphology in Sprague-Dawley Rats following Treatment with an Organochlorine Mixture in Utero and Neonatal Genistein Toxicol. Sci., January 1, 2004; 77(1): 91 - 100. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. E. Fenton, J. T. Hamm, L. S. Birnbaum, and G. L. Youngblood Persistent Abnormalities in the Rat Mammary Gland following Gestational and Lactational Exposure to 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) Toxicol. Sci., May 1, 2002; 67(1): 63 - 74. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. C. Lewis, S. Hudgins, A. Lewis, K. Schorr, R. Sommer, R. E. Peterson, J. A. Flaws, and P. A. Furth In Utero and Lactational Treatment with 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin Impairs Mammary Gland Differentiation but Does Not Block the Response to Exogenous Estrogen in the Postpubertal Female Rat Toxicol. Sci., July 1, 2001; 62(1): 46 - 53. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. Davis II, F. T. Lauer, A. D. Burdick, L. G. Hudson, and S. W. Burchiel Prevention of Apoptosis by 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) in the MCF-10A Cell Line: Correlation with Increased Transforming GrowthFactor {{alpha}} Production Cancer Res., April 1, 2001; 61(8): 3314 - 3320. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
G. M. Solomon and T. Schettler Environment and health: 6. Endocrine disruption and potential human health implications Can. Med. Assoc. J., November 1, 2000; 163(11): 1471 - 1476. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||









