Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (27)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kozack, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Loechler, E. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kozack, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Loechler, E. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1999 Oxford University Press

Article

A hypothesis for what conformation of the major adduct of (+)-anti-B[a]PDE (N2-dG) causes G->T versus G->A mutations based upon a correlation between mutagenesis and molecular modeling results

Richard E. Kozack, Rajiv Shukla and Edward L. Loechler1

Department of Biology, Boston University, 2 Cummington Street, Boston, MA 02215, USA

Molecular modeling (simulated annealing) was used to study the conformations in dsDNA of [+ta]-B[a]P–N2-dG (R.E.Kozack and E.L.Loechler, accompanying paper), which is the major benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P) adduct. Sixteen classes of conformations were identified, and are analyzed herein vis-a-vis the two most prominent B[a]P mutations, G->T and G->A base substitutions. Eight conformations seem more relevant to frameshift mutagenesis, so they are excluded, leaving eight conformations as follows. Two conformations (BPmi5 and BPmi3) retain Watson–Crick G:C base pairing having the B[a]P moiety of the adduct in the minor groove. Two conformations (BPma5 and BPma3) have the Hoogsteen orientation with B[a]P in the major groove. Four conformations are base displaced and have B[a]P stacked in the helix with the dG moiety of the adduct displaced into either the major groove (Gma5 and Gma3) or the minor groove (Gmi5 and Gmi3). Three of these eight conformations (BPma5, BPma3 and Gma3) are universally high in energy. The two conformations that retain G:C base pairing potential (BPmi5 and BPmi3) are likely to be non-mutagenic. Of the three remaining conformations, Gmi5 can be relatively low in energy, but is distorted. A correlation exists between the calculated energies for the remaining two base displaced conformations and mutagenesis for [+ta]-B[a]P–N2-dG, leading to the hypothesis that Gma5 is responsible for G->T mutations and Gmi3 is responsible for G->A mutations. Gma5 and Gmi3 resemble each other, except that dG is in the major and minor grooves, respectively. An incipient rationale for this hypothesis is discussed: DNA polymerase might be triggered to follow a different mutagenic pathway depending upon whether a non-informational lesion has bulk protruding into the major or minor groove. A pathway for interconversion between these eight conformations is also proposed and its implications are discussed; e.g. four steps are required to interconvert between Gma5 and Gmi3.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
A. Nagalingam, K.-Y. Seo, and E. L. Loechler
Mutagenesis studies of the major benzo[a]pyrene N2-dG adduct in a 5'-TG versus a 5'-UG sequence: removal of the methyl group causes a modest decrease in the [G->T/G->A] mutational ratio
Mutagenesis, March 1, 2005; 20(2): 105 - 110.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
A. Besaratinia and G. P. Pfeifer
Enhancement of the Mutagenicity of Benzo(a)pyrene Diol Epoxide by a Nonmutagenic Dose of Ultraviolet A Radiation
Cancer Res., December 15, 2003; 63(24): 8708 - 8716.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
A. B. Guliaev, J. Sagi, and B. Singer
Sequence-dependent conformational perturbation in DNA duplexes containing an {epsilon}AT mismatch using molecular dynamics simulation
Carcinogenesis, September 1, 2000; 21(9): 1727 - 1736.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
R. Shukla, N. E. Geacintov, and E. L. Loechler
The major, N2-dG adduct of (+)-anti-B[a]PDE induces G->A mutations in a 5'-AGA-3' sequence context
Carcinogenesis, February 1, 1999; 20(2): 261 - 268.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
R. E. Kozack and E. L. Loechler
Molecular modeling of the major adduct of (+)-anti-B[a]PDE (N2-dG) in the eight conformations and the five DNA sequences most relevant to base substitution mutagenesis
Carcinogenesis, January 1, 1999; 20(1): 85 - 94.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.