Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mironov, N.
Right arrow Articles by Yamasaki, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mironov, N.
Right arrow Articles by Yamasaki, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Carcinogenesis, Vol. 20, No. 11, 2189-2192, November 1999
© 1999 Oxford University Press


Short Communications

A novel sensitive method to detect frameshift mutations in exonic repeat sequences of cancer-related genes

N. Mironov1, L.A.M. Jansen, W.-B. Zhu, A.-M. Aguelon, G. Reguer and H. Yamasaki

Unit of Multistage Carcinogenesis, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 69372 Lyon Cedex 08, France

We have investigated frameshift mutations in exonic repeats in the ATR, BRCA1, BRCA2, PTCH, CTCF, Cx26, NuMa and TGFßRII genes, using human tumor samples from stomach, esophagus, breast and skin and melanoma, as well as colon cancer and endometrial cancer cell lines (125 samples in total). We developed a sensitive method to detect mutations in the repeats, using the introduction of an artificial restriction site into a repeat. The method detects a single mutant among 103 normal genes. Thus, an alteration in a repeated sequence can be detected unambiguously. The (A)8 repeat of BRCA2 was found mutated in only two of five colon cell lines with microsatellite instability (MI+). The ATR gene has an (A)10 repeat which was altered in two of three MI+ stomach cancer samples and one of three MI+ endometrial cell lines. The TGFßRII gene [with an (A)10 repeat] had the maximal frequency of mutations: 10 out of 13 MI+ samples. At least one sample from all types of cancers, except melanomas, was positive for TGFßRII gene mutations. No mutations were found in repeats in the BRCA1, PTCH, CTCF, NuMA and Cx26 genes in any types of tumors examined. In conclusion, our study indicates that repeats were altered only in MI+ cells and that the mutation frequencies in the genes studied differ among tumor types. Based on these results, we discuss meaningful and meaningless alterations in exonic repeats.

Abbreviations: HNPCC, human non-polyposis colorectal cancer; MI, microsatellite instability; RER, replication error.

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed Email: mironov{at}iarc.fr


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
K. A. Lewis, S. Mullany, B. Thomas, J. Chien, R. Loewen, V. Shridhar, and W. A. Cliby
Heterozygous ATR Mutations in Mismatch Repair-Deficient Cancer Cells Have Functional Significance
Cancer Res., August 15, 2005; 65(16): 7091 - 7095.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
A. Duval and R. Hamelin
Mutations at Coding Repeat Sequences in Mismatch Repair-deficient Human Cancers: Toward a New Concept of Target Genes for Instability
Cancer Res., May 1, 2002; 62(9): 2447 - 2454.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
Y. Mori, J. Yin, A. Rashid, B. A. Leggett, J. Young, L. Simms, P. M. Kuehl, P. Langenberg, S. J. Meltzer, and O. C. Stine
Instabilotyping: Comprehensive Identification of Frameshift Mutations Caused by Coding Region Microsatellite Instability
Cancer Res., August 1, 2001; 61(16): 6046 - 6049.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.