Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (20)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mohr, U.
Right arrow Articles by Tomatis, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mohr, U.
Right arrow Articles by Tomatis, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Carcinogenesis, Vol. 20, No. 2, 325-332, February 1999
© 1999 Oxford University Press

Possible carcinogenic effects of X-rays in a transgenerational study with CBA mice

U. Mohr4, C. Dasenbrock1, T. Tillmann, M. Kohler1, K. Kamino, G. Hagemann, G. Morawietz1, E. Campo2, M. Cazorla2, P. Fernandez2, L. Hernandez2, A. Cardesa2 and L. Tomatis3

Institut für Experimentelle Pathologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, D-30625 Hannover, Germany,
1 Fraunhofer-Institut für Toxikologie und Aerosolforschung, Nikolai-Fuchs-Straße 1, D-30625 Hannover, Germany,
2 Departamento de Anatomia Patologica, Hospital Cliníc, Villaroel 170, E-8036 Barcelona, Spain and
3 Istituto per l'Infanzia, Via dell'Istria 65/1, I-34137 Trieste, Italy

A lifetime experiment using 4279 CBA/J mice was carried out to investigate whether the pre-conceptual exposure of sperm cells to X-ray radiation or urethane would result in an increased cancer risk in the untreated progeny, and/or increased susceptibility to cancer following exposure to a promoting agent. The study consisted of four main groups, namely a control group (saline), a urethane group (1 mg/g body wt) and two X-ray radiation groups (1 Gy, 2 Gy). At 1, 3 and 9 weeks after treatment, the males of these four parental groups were mated with untreated virgin females. The offspring of each parental group was divided into two subgroups: one received s.c. urethane (0.1 mg/g body wt once) as a promoter, the other saline, at the age of 6 weeks. All animals were evaluated for the occurrence of tumours. K-ras oncogene and p53 tumour suppressor gene mutations were investigated in frozen lung tumour samples. The female offspring of male parents exposed to X-rays 1 week before their mating showed a trend towards a higher tumour incidence of the haematopoietic system than the F1 controls. In addition, a higher percentage of bronchiolo-alveolar adenocarcinomas in male offspring born to irradiated paternals mated 1 week after X-ray treatment points to a plausible increased sensitivity of post-meiotic germ cell stages towards transgenerational carcinogenic effects. On the other hand, no increased tumour incidence and malignancy were observed in the offspring born to irradiated paternals mated 3 and 9 weeks after X-ray treatment. Paternal urethane treatment 1, 3 and 9 weeks prior to conception did not result in significantly altered incidence or malignancy of tumours of the lung, liver and haematopoietic tissue in the offspring. K-ras mutations increased during tumour progression from bronchiolo-alveolar hyperplasia to adenoma. Codon 61 K-ras mutations were more frequent in lung tumours of urethane-promoted progeny from irradiated parents than from control parents. P53 mutations were absent from these lung alterations.

Abbreviations: DEN, diethylnitrosamine; H & E, haematoxylin and eosin; PCR–RFLP, polymerase chain reaction–restriction fragment length polymorphism; SSCP, single-strand conformation polymorphism.

4 To whom correspondence should be addressed


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
M. D. Anway and M. K. Skinner
Epigenetic Transgenerational Actions of Endocrine Disruptors
Endocrinology, June 1, 2006; 147(6): s43 - s49.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
X. O. Shu, J. D. Potter, M. S. Linet, R. K. Severson, D. Han, J. H. Kersey, J. P. Neglia, M. E. Trigg, and L. L. Robison
Diagnostic X-Rays and Ultrasound Exposure and Risk of Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia by Immunophenotype
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., February 1, 2002; 11(2): 177 - 185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol PatholHome page
T. Tillmann, K. Kamino, C. Dasenbrock, P. G. Germann, M. Kohler, G. Morawietz, E. Campo, A. Cardesa, L. Tomatis, and U. Mohr
Ito Cell Tumor: Immunohistochemical Investigations of a Rare Lesion in the Liver of Mice
Toxicol Pathol, May 1, 1999; 27(3): 364 - 369.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.