Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yusuf, A.
Right arrow Articles by Sarma, D. S.R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yusuf, A.
Right arrow Articles by Sarma, D. S.R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Carcinogenesis, Vol. 20, No. 6, 1143-1145, June 1999
© 1999 Oxford University Press


Short Communication

The effect of 1/3 partial hepatectomy on the growth of glutathione S-transferase positive foci

Aroon Yusuf, Ezio Laconi1, Prema M. Rao, Srinivasan Rajalakshmi and Dittakavi S.R. Sarma2

Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Medical Sciences Building, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A8, Canada and
1 Ospedale Oncologico `A. Businco' and Istituto di Patologia Sperimentale Universita di Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy

Our previous studies indicated that glutathione S-transferase 7-7 (GST 7-7) positive foci induced after initiation have a lower threshold towards proliferative stimuli compared with surrounding hepatocytes. This observation would predict that persistent growth stimuli of low intensity could be very effective in promoting the emergence of focal lesions. To test this possibility, the present study was designed to determine the effect of 1/3 partial hepatectomy (PH) on the incidence and growth of foci in initiated rat liver. The rationale for using a 1/3 PH was that it is known to induce a proliferative response which is less intense but more prolonged compared with that elicited by 2/3 PH. Male Fischer 344 rats (110–120 g) were initiated with diethylnitrosamine (200 mg/kg, i.p.). Three weeks later 1/3 PH (median lobe), 2/3 PH (median and left lobes) or sham operation (SH) was performed. An additional group of initiated animals had the median lobe and the left lobe of the liver removed sequentially (1/3 + 1/3 PH), 3 weeks apart. All rats were killed 8 weeks after carcinogen administration. The results indicated that the number of GST 7-7 positive foci was similar in all groups; however, the percent area occupied by foci was increased in rats receiving 2/3 PH compared with SH (0.21 ± 0.08 versus 0.09 ± 0.03). Interestingly, 1/3 PH was nearly as effective as 2/3 PH in stimulating the growth of foci (percent area 0.18 ± 0.06 versus 0.21 ± 0.08), although the magnitude of the stimulus is only half for the former group compared with the latter; peak labeling index was 19 ± 6 with 1/3 PH compared with 40 ± 2 with 2/3 PH. Moreover, the maximum increase in the size of foci (percent area 0.37 ± 0.12) was achieved when the median and left lobes were removed sequentially, three weeks apart. These results indicate that persistent growth stimuli of low intensity can be very effective in promoting the growth of focal lesions.

Abbreviations: GST, glutathione S-transferase; DEN, diethylnitrosamine; PH, partial hepatectomy; SH, sham hepatectomy.

2 To whom correspondence should be addressed Email: sarma.dittakavi{at}utoronto.ca


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. Mitchell, M. Nivison, L. F. Jackson, R. Fox, D. C. Lee, J. S. Campbell, and N. Fausto
Heparin-binding Epidermal Growth Factor-like Growth Factor Links Hepatocyte Priming with Cell Cycle Progression during Liver Regeneration
J. Biol. Chem., January 28, 2005; 280(4): 2562 - 2568.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.