Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (51)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by White, I. N.H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by White, I. N.H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Carcinogenesis, Vol. 20, No. 7, 1153-1160, July 1999
© 1999 Oxford University Press


Commentary

The tamoxifen dilemma

Ian N.H. White

MRC Toxicology Unit, Hodgkin Building, Lancaster Road, Leicester LE1 9HN, UK

The anti-oestrogen tamoxifen is widely used for adjuvant therapy in the treatment of women with breast cancer and has a low incidence of serious side-effects. It could also play a role as a breast cancer chemopreventive agent. However, epidemiological studies in both tamoxifen-treated breast cancer patients and in healthy women have shown that treatment results in a small increase in the incidence of endometrial cancers. While the use of tamoxifen in breast cancer patients is clearly justified, the situation for its use as a chemopreventive agent in healthy women is not so clear cut. Reasons for caution come from studies in rats that show that tamoxifen is a genotoxic mutagenic liver carcinogen. Initiation of tumours in the rat is the result of metabolic activation of tamoxifen by CYP enzymes to an electrophile(s) that binds irreversibly to DNA. This is not related to the oestrogen receptor status of the tissue. The extent of DNA damage, detected by 32P-post-labelling or accelerator mass spectrometry, is dependent both on the dose and the length of exposure. Studies have been carried out to see if such binding occurs in the uterine endometrium from tamoxifen-treated women. Results are presently inconclusive, but if such irreversible DNA binding occurs, it is at very low levels. Based on a mechanistic understanding of tamoxifen-induced liver carcinogenesis in the rat, it seems that in humans hepatic DNA damage will be close to the limit of detection by 32P-post-labelling and liver cancer will not be a significant carcinogenic risk. We cannot be certain of the mode of action of tamoxifen that results in the increase in endometrial cancers in treated women but it seems unlikely that this will be associated with a classical genotoxic mechanism.

Abbreviations: ER, oestrogen receptor; ICI 182 780, 7{alpha}-[9-(4,4,5,5,5-pentafluoropentylsulfinyl)nonyl]estra-1,3,5(10)-triene-3,17ß-diol; raloxifene, [6-hydroxy-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-benzo[b]thien-3-yl][4-[2-(1-piperidinyl)ethoxy]-phenyl]methanone; SERMS, selective oestrogen receptor modulators; tamoxifen, (Z)-1-[4-[(dimethylamino)ethoxy]phenyl]-1,1-diphenyl-1-butene; toremifene, (Z)-4-chloro-1-[4-[2(N,N-dimethylamino)ethoxy]phenyl]-1-butene.

Email: iw6{at}le.ac.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
V. P. Tryndyak, L. Muskhelishvili, O. Kovalchuk, R. Rodriguez-Juarez, B. Montgomery, M. I. Churchwell, S. A. Ross, F. A. Beland, and I. P. Pogribny
Effect of long-term tamoxifen exposure on genotoxic and epigenetic changes in rat liver: implications for tamoxifen-induced hepatocarcinogenesis
Carcinogenesis, August 1, 2006; 27(8): 1713 - 1720.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
D. H. Phillips, A. Hewer, M. R. Osborne, K. J. Cole, C. Churchill, and V. M. Arlt
Organ specificity of DNA adduct formation by tamoxifen and {alpha}-hydroxytamoxifen in the rat: implications for understanding the mechanism(s) of tamoxifen carcinogenicity and for human risk assessment
Mutagenesis, July 1, 2005; 20(4): 297 - 303.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
L. J. Schild, D. H. Phillips, M. R. Osborne, A. Hewer, F. A. Beland, M. I. Churchwell, K. Brown, M. Gaskell, E. Wright, and M. C. Poirier
Hepatic DNA adduct dosimetry in rats fed tamoxifen: a comparison of methods
Mutagenesis, March 1, 2005; 20(2): 115 - 124.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Drug Metab. Dispos.Home page
T. I. Apak and M. W. Duffel
INTERACTIONS OF THE STEREOISOMERS OF {alpha}-HYDROXYTAMOXIFEN WITH HUMAN HYDROXYSTEROID SULFOTRANSFERASE SULT2A1 AND RAT HYDROXYSTEROID SULFOTRANSFERASE STA
Drug Metab. Dispos., December 1, 2004; 32(12): 1501 - 1508.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
M.E. Heres-Pulido, I. Duenas-Garcia, L. Castaneda-Partida, A. Sanchez-Garcia, M. Contreras-Sousa, A. Duran-Diaz, and U. Graf
Genotoxicity of tamoxifen citrate and 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide in the wing spot test of Drosophila melanogaster
Mutagenesis, May 1, 2004; 19(3): 187 - 193.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
A. Mizutani, T. Okada, S. Shibutani, E. Sonoda, H. Hochegger, C. Nishigori, Y. Miyachi, S. Takeda, and M. Yamazoe
Extensive Chromosomal Breaks Are Induced by Tamoxifen and Estrogen in DNA Repair-Deficient Cells
Cancer Res., May 1, 2004; 64(9): 3144 - 3147.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
D. J. Boocock, K. Brown, A. H. Gibbs, E. Sanchez, K. W. Turteltaub, and I. N.H. White
Identification of human CYP forms involved in the activation of tamoxifen and irreversible binding to DNA
Carcinogenesis, November 1, 2002; 23(11): 1897 - 1902.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
T. Chen, G. Gamboa da Costa, M.M. Marques, S. D. Shelton, F. A. Beland, and M. G. Manjanatha
Mutations induced by {alpha}-hydroxytamoxifen in the lacI and cII genes of Big Blue transgenic rats
Carcinogenesis, October 1, 2002; 23(10): 1751 - 1758.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
G. Gamboa da Costa, L.P. McDaniel-Hamilton, R. H. Heflich, M.M. Marques, and F. A. Beland
DNA adduct formation and mutant induction in Sprague-Dawley rats treated with tamoxifen and its derivatives
Carcinogenesis, August 1, 2001; 22(8): 1307 - 1315.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
D. H. Phillips
Understanding the genotoxicity of tamoxifen?
Carcinogenesis, June 1, 2001; 22(6): 839 - 849.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
I. N.H. White, P. Carthew, R. Davies, J. Styles, K. Brown, J. E. Brown, L. L. Smith, and E. A. Martin
Short-term dosing of {{alpha}}-hydroxytamoxifen results in DNA damage but does not lead to liver tumours in female Wistar/Han rats
Carcinogenesis, April 1, 2001; 22(4): 553 - 557.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
D. J. Boocock, J. L. Maggs, K. Brown, I. N.H. White, and B.K. Park
Major inter-species differences in the rates of O-sulphonation and O-glucuronylation of {alpha}-hydroxytamoxifen in vitro: a metabolic disparity protecting human liver from the formation of tamoxifen-DNA adducts
Carcinogenesis, October 1, 2000; 21(10): 1851 - 1858.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
S. Shibutani, A. Ravindernath, N. Suzuki, I. Terashima, S. M. Sugarman, A. P. Grollman, and M. L. Pearl
Identification of tamoxifen-DNA adducts in the endometrium of women treated with tamoxifen
Carcinogenesis, August 1, 2000; 21(8): 1461 - 1467.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
S. Shibutani, J. T. Reardon, N. Suzuki, and A. Sancar
Excision of Tamoxifen-DNA Adducts by the Human Nucleotide Excision Repair System
Cancer Res., May 1, 2000; 60(10): 2607 - 2610.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
H. Bartsch, D. H. Phillips, J. Nair, A. Hewer, G. Meyberg-Solomeyer, and E.-M. Grischke
Lack of evidence for tamoxifen- and toremifene-DNA adducts in lymphocytes of treated patients
Carcinogenesis, April 1, 2000; 21(4): 845 - 847.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.