Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (20)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Owens, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Smart, R. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Owens, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Smart, R. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Carcinogenesis, Vol. 20, No. 9, 1837-1844, September 1999
© 1999 Oxford University Press


Carcinogenesis

A multihit, multistage model of chemical carcinogenesis

David M. Owens2, S.-J. Caroline Wei1 and Robert C. Smart3

Molecular and Cellular Toxicology, Department of Toxicology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7633 and
1 Laboratory for Cancer Research, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08855, USA

Carcinogenesis involves the accumulation of genetic changes within a single cell. Tumor promotion functions in the initial clonal expansion of an initiated cell but is generally not considered to influence later stages. To investigate whether tumor promotion can influence later stages of carcinogenesis we developed a two-hit 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene (D) protocol designed to enrich for keratinocytes that contain at least two D-induced genetic alterations. FVB/N mice were initiated with D and promoted with 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (T) or treated with acetone (A) vehicle for 6 weeks. At 7 weeks after the start of promotion, but before visible papilloma development, groups of mice were treated with a second dose of D or A and 1 week later T promotion was resumed. D/T/A/T mice developed 2.8 papillomas/mouse and D/A/D/T mice demonstrated an additive tumor response and developed 5.8 papillomas/mouse. Importantly, D/T/D/T mice developed 12.4 papillomas/mouse, thereby demonstrating a synergistic tumor response compared with D/A/D/T and D/T/A/T mice. D/T/D/T papillomas exhibited increases in suprabasal S phase cells and keratin 13 expression when compared with D/T/A/T papillomas. D/T/D/T mice developed squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) 10 weeks earlier than D/T/A/T mice and demonstrated a 96% malignancy incidence and 1.71 SCC/mouse compared with D/T/A/T mice, which demonstrated a 28% malignancy incidence and 0.32 SCC/mouse. Greater than 90% of D/T/A/T and D/T/D/T papillomas and SCCs contained mutant Ha-ras, while a normal Ha-ras allele persisted in all cases, indicating that a gene other than the remaining normal allele of Ha-ras was a target gene for the second D hit. These data demonstrate that: (i) promotion between the first and second hits has a profound outcome on carcinogenesis, presumably by increasing the probability that a second hit will occur in a previously initiated cell; (ii) continued promotion after the second hit is required for full expression of malignancy; (iii) the classic initiation–promotion protocol can be extended to a multihit, multistage model.

Abbreviations: A, acetone; BrdU, 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine; D, 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene; MNNG, N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitroguanidine; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma; SSCP, single-strand conformation polymorphism; SURF, selective UV radiation fractionation; T, 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate.

2 Present address: Imperial Cancer Research Fund, Keratinocyte Laboratory, London WC2A 3PX, UK

3 To whom correspondence should be addressed Email: rcsmart{at}unity.ncsu.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
H. Fung, P. Liu, and B. Demple
ATF4-Dependent Oxidative Induction of the DNA Repair Enzyme Ape1 Counteracts Arsenite Cytotoxicity and Suppresses Arsenite-Mediated Mutagenesis
Mol. Cell. Biol., December 15, 2007; 27(24): 8834 - 8847.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
R. E. Sadun, S. M. Sachsman, X. Chen, K. W. Christenson, W. Z. Morris, P. Hu, and A. L. Epstein
Immune Signatures of Murine and Human Cancers Reveal Unique Mechanisms of Tumor Escape and New Targets for Cancer Immunotherapy
Clin. Cancer Res., July 1, 2007; 13(13): 4016 - 4025.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. J. Roberts, B. Y. Ng, R. B. Filler, J. Lewis, E. J. Glusac, A. C. Hayday, R. E. Tigelaar, and M. Girardi
Characterizing tumor-promoting T cells in chemically induced cutaneous carcinogenesis
PNAS, April 17, 2007; 104(16): 6770 - 6775.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
R.A. Crallan, N.T. Georgopoulos, and J. Southgate
Experimental models of human bladder carcinogenesis
Carcinogenesis, March 1, 2006; 27(3): 374 - 381.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
C. Niemann, D. M. Owens, J. Hulsken, W. Birchmeier, and F. M. Watt
Expression of {Delta}NLef1 in mouse epidermis results in differentiation of hair follicles into squamous epidermal cysts and formation of skin tumours
Development, January 1, 2002; 129(1): 95 - 109.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
D. M. Owens and F. M. Watt
Influence of {beta}1 Integrins on Epidermal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Formation in a Transgenic Mouse Model: {{alpha}}3{beta}1, but not {{alpha}}2{beta}1, Suppresses Malignant Conversion
Cancer Res., July 1, 2001; 61(13): 5248 - 5254.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
M. Girardi, D. E. Oppenheim, C. R. Steele, J. M. Lewis, E. Glusac, R. Filler, P. Hobby, B. Sutton, R. E. Tigelaar, and A. C. Hayday
Regulation of Cutaneous Malignancy by gamma delta T Cells
Science, October 19, 2001; 294(5542): 605 - 609.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.