Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (79)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Poirier, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Weston, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Poirier, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Weston, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Carcinogenesis, Vol. 21, No. 3, 353-359, March 2000
© 2000 Oxford University Press


Carcinogenesis

Carcinogen macromolecular adducts and their measurement

Miriam C. Poirier3, Regina M. Santella1 and Ainsley Weston2

Carcinogen–DNA Interactions Section, LCCTP, Division of Basic Sciences, NCI, NIH, Building 37, Room 2A05, 37 Convent Drive, MSC-4255, Bethesda, MD 20892,
1 Joseph L.Mailman School of Public Health of Columbia University, 701 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032,
2 Molecular Carcinogenesis Team, TMBB, Health Effects Laboratory Division, NIOSH, CDC, 1095 Willowdale Road, Morgantown, WV 26505, USA

Damage to DNA induced by carcinogenic chemicals reflects exposure and is directly related to tumor formation, whereas modification of protein provides relatively precise dosimetry for stable adducts of proteins with a known half-life. Sophisticated methods for the detection and quantitation of DNA and protein adducts have been developed during the last ~25 years. For DNA adducts the most widely used methods include electrochemical detection, mass spectrometry, fluorescence and phosphorescence spectroscopy, immunoassays and immunohistochemistry and 32P-post-labeling. Detection limits for quantitative assays are typically in the range of 1 adduct in 107 or 109 nucleotides. However, accelerator mass spectrometry, which is highly sophisticated but less accessible, has a detection limit of ~1 adduct in 1012 nucleotides. Methods for the determination of protein adducts include immunoassay and a variety of elegant high-resolution mass spectrometry approaches. The detection limit of ~0.1 fmol for protein adducts, is based primarily on method specificity and the availability of large quantities of sample material. Using these highly sensitive methods a major achievement has been the biomonitoring of chemically exposed human populations. Validation of macromolecular adduct formation in humans has been predicated on studies in animal models. Adduct formation in humans appears to be indicative of molecular dosimetry and suggestive of increased human cancer risk. However, despite the large body of literature documenting DNA and protein adduct molecular dosimetry for many carcinogen exposures, the relationship between adduct formation and human cancer risk has been defined for only a few carcinogens. Thus, elucidation of this association remains a compelling challenge. For the future, integration of DNA and protein adduct measurements together with documentation of correlative and subsequent events, and host susceptibility factors, within the context of valid molecular epidemiologic study designs, will further our understanding of human disease mechanisms.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
K. E. Coldwell, S. M. Cutts, T. J. Ognibene, P. T. Henderson, and D. R. Phillips
Detection of Adriamycin-DNA adducts by accelerator mass spectrometry at clinically relevant Adriamycin concentrations
Nucleic Acids Res., September 1, 2008; 36(16): e100 - e100.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
E. Gyorffy, L. Anna, K. Kovacs, P. Rudnai, and B. Schoket
Correlation between biomarkers of human exposure to genotoxins with focus on carcinogen-DNA adducts
Mutagenesis, January 1, 2008; 23(1): 1 - 18.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
B. Pesch, M. Kappler, K. Straif, B. Marczynski, R. Preuss, B. Rossbach, H.-P. Rihs, T. Weiss, S. Rabstein, C. Pierl, et al.
Dose-Response Modeling of Occupational Exposure to Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons with Biomarkers of Exposure and Effect
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., September 1, 2007; 16(9): 1863 - 1873.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
S. Ben-Zaken Cohen, P. D. Pare, S. F. P. Man, and D. D. Sin
The Growing Burden of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Lung Cancer in Women: Examining Sex Differences in Cigarette Smoke Metabolism
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., July 15, 2007; 176(2): 113 - 120.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Drug Metab. Dispos.Home page
H. Dong, N. Suzuki, M. C. Torres, R. R. Bonala, F. Johnson, A. P. Grollman, and S. Shibutani
QUANTITATIVE DETERMINATION OF ARISTOLOCHIC ACID-DERIVED DNA ADDUCTS IN RATS USING 32P-POSTLABELING/POLYACRYLAMIDE GEL ELECTROPHORESIS ANALYSIS
Drug Metab. Dispos., July 1, 2006; 34(7): 1122 - 1127.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
aacredbookHome page
S. S. Hecht
DNA Adducts of Tobacco Smoke Carcinogens
Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. Educ. Book, April 1, 2006; 2006(1): 217 - 222.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
V. M. Arlt
3-Nitrobenzanthrone, a potential human cancer hazard in diesel exhaust and urban air pollution: a review of the evidence
Mutagenesis, November 1, 2005; 20(6): 399 - 410.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
R. A. Sharma and P. B. Farmer
Biological Relevance of Adduct Detection to the Chemoprevention of Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2004; 10(15): 4901 - 4912.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
E. Gyorffy, L. Anna, Z. Gyori, J. Segesdi, J. Minarovits, I. Soltesz, S. Kostic, A. Csekeo, M. C. Poirier, and B. Schoket
DNA adducts in tumour, normal peripheral lung and bronchus, and peripheral blood lymphocytes from smoking and non-smoking lung cancer patients: correlations between tissues and detection by 32P-postlabelling and immunoassay
Carcinogenesis, July 1, 2004; 25(7): 1201 - 1209.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
S. S. Hecht, M. Chen, H. Yagi, D. M. Jerina, and S. G. Carmella
r-1,t-2,3,c-4-Tetrahydroxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydrophenanthrene in Human Urine: A Potential Biomarker for Assessing Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Metabolic Activation
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 2003; 12(12): 1501 - 1508.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
J. R. Bacon, G. Williamson, R. C. Garner, G. Lappin, S. Langouet, and Y. Bao
Sulforaphane and quercetin modulate PhIP-DNA adduct formation in human HepG2 cells and hepatocytes
Carcinogenesis, December 1, 2003; 24(12): 1903 - 1911.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol PatholHome page
H. Tsuda, S. Fukushima, H. Wanibuchi, K. Morimura, D. Nakae, K. Imaida, M. Tatematsu, M. Hirose, K. Wakabayashi, and M. A. Moore
Value of GST-P Positive Preneoplastic Hepatic Foci in Dose-Response Studies of Hepatocarcinogenesis: Evidence for Practical Thresholds with Both Genotoxic and Nongenotoxic Carcinogens. A Review of Recent Work
Toxicol Pathol, January 1, 2003; 31(1): 80 - 86.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
D. H. Phillips
Smoking-related DNA and protein adducts in human tissues
Carcinogenesis, December 1, 2002; 23(12): 1979 - 2004.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
R. L. Divi, F. A. Beland, P. P. Fu, L. S. Von Tungeln, B. Schoket, J. E. Camara, M. Ghei, N. Rothman, R. Sinha, and M. C. Poirier
Highly sensitive chemiluminescence immunoassay for benzo[a]pyrene-DNA adducts: validation by comparison with other methods, and use in human biomonitoring
Carcinogenesis, December 1, 2002; 23(12): 2043 - 2049.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
F. P. Perera, L. A. Mooney, M. Stampfer, D. H. Phillips, D. A. Bell, A. Rundle, S. Cho, W.-Y. Tsai, J. Ma, A. Blackwood, et al.
Associations between carcinogen-DNA damage, glutathione S-transferase genotypes, and risk of lung cancer in the prospective Physicians' Health Cohort Study
Carcinogenesis, October 1, 2002; 23(10): 1641 - 1646.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
M. D. Gammon, R. M. Santella, A. I. Neugut, S. M. Eng, S. L. Teitelbaum, A. Paykin, B. Levin, M. B. Terry, T. L. Young, L. W. Wang, et al.
Environmental Toxins and Breast Cancer on Long Island. I. Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon DNA Adducts
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., August 1, 2002; 11(8): 677 - 685.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
C. Zhao and K. Hemminki
The in vivo levels of DNA alkylation products in human lymphocytes are not age dependent: an assay of 7-methyl- and 7-(2-hydroxyethyl)-guanine DNA adducts
Carcinogenesis, February 1, 2002; 23(2): 307 - 310.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
D. Tang, D. H. Phillips, M. Stampfer, L. A. Mooney, Y. Hsu, S. Cho, W.-Y. Tsai, J. Ma, K. J. Cole, M. N. She, et al.
Association between Carcinogen-DNA Adducts in White Blood Cells and Lung Cancer Risk in the Physicians Health Study
Cancer Res., September 1, 2001; 61(18): 6708 - 6712.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
F. P. Guengerich
Metabolism of chemical carcinogens
Carcinogenesis, March 1, 2000; 21(3): 345 - 351.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.