Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mason, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ryan, K. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mason, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ryan, K. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Carcinogenesis, Vol. 22, No. 10, 1701-1708, October 2001
© 2001 Oxford University Press


CARCINOGENESIS

Lack of effect of 94 GHz radio frequency radiation exposure in an animal model of skin carcinogenesis

Patrick A. Mason5,, Thomas J. Walters1,, John DiGiovanni3,, Charles W. Beason, James R. Jauchem, Edward J. Dick, Jr, Kavita Mahajan2,4,, Steven J. Dusch4,, Beth A. Shields4,, James H. Merritt, Michael R. Murphy and Kathy L. Ryan1,

Air Force Research Laboratory, Directed Energy Bioeffects Division, Brooks AFB, TX, 78235,
1 US Army Institute of Surgical Research, Fort Sam Houston, TX, 78234,
2 Veridian Engineering Inc., San Antonio, TX, 78216,
3 Department of Carcinogenesis, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Science Park, Smithville, TX 78957 and
4 Department of Biology, Trinity University, San Antonio, TX, 78212, USA

Although there is no evidence that electromagnetic energy in the radio frequency radiation (RFR) band is mutagenic, there have been suggestions that RFR energy might serve as either a promoter or co-promoter in some animal models of carcinogenesis. Recent developments in electromagnetic technology have resulted in the manufacture of RFR sources capable of generating frequencies in the millimeter wavelength (MMW) range (30–300 GHz). Because absorption of MMW energy occurs in the skin, it is to be expected that long-term detrimental health effects, if any, would most likely be manifest in the skin. In this study we investigated whether a single (1.0 W/cm2 for 10 s) or repeated (2 exposures/week for 12 weeks, 333 mW/cm2 for 10 s) exposure to 94 GHz RFR serves as a promoter or co-promoter in the 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene (DMBA)-induced SENCAR mouse model of skin carcinogenesis. Neither paradigm of MMW exposure significantly affected papilloma development, as evidenced by a lack of effect on tumor incidence and multiplicity. There was also no evidence that MMW exposure served as a co-promoter in DMBA-induced animals repeatedly treated with 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol 13-acetate. Therefore, we conclude that exposure to 94 GHz RFR under these conditions does not promote or co-promote papilloma development in this animal model of skin carcinogenesis.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.