Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (21)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Parzefall, W.
Right arrow Articles by Thurman, R. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Parzefall, W.
Right arrow Articles by Thurman, R. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Carcinogenesis, Vol. 22, No. 3, 519-523, March 2001
© 2001 Oxford University Press


SHORT COMMUNICATION

Peroxisome proliferators do not increase DNA synthesis in purified rat hepatocytes

Wolfram Parzefall1,, Walter Berger, Eveline Kainzbauer, Olga Teufelhofer, Rolf Schulte-Hermann and Ronald G. Thurman

Institut für Krebsforschung, Universität Wien, Borschkegasse 8a, A-1090 Wien, Austria

There have been numerous reports that chemicals which induce peroxisomes in rodent liver increase DNA synthesis in isolated hepatic parenchymal cells, but not as well in vitro as in vivo. It is also known that tumour necrosis factor {alpha} (TNF{alpha}) is mitogenic in isolated hepatocytes. Since Kupffer cells are a major source of TNF{alpha} in the liver and have recently been shown to be activated by peroxisome proliferators, the possibility exists that the effect of peroxisome proliferators on DNA synthesis in parenchymal cells is via Kupffer cell contamination of isolated hepatocyte preparations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate this hypothesis by studying the effect of model peroxisome proliferators on purified hepatocyte preparations. Hepatocytes were prepared from rat liver by standard calcium-free and collagenase perfusion. Subsequently, cells were centrifuged through Percoll to remove contaminating non-parenchymal cells. Cells were at least 99.9% pure as assessed by cell counting using specific markers for hepatocytes (resorufin O-glucoside) and Kupffer cells (FITC-labelled latex beads). Hepatocytes were cultured in Williams medium + 10% fetal bovine serum for 24 h followed by culture for 48 h in Williams medium plus or minus drug or mitogen additions. Under these conditions epidermal growth factor stimulated DNA synthesis assessed by incorporation of [3H]thymidine ~5-fold over control levels. The peroxisome proliferators WY,14-643 and nafenopin, however, had no effect on DNA synthesis, although they did increase acyl-CoA oxidase as expected. In contrast, TNF{alpha} increased cell proliferation nearly 10-fold in purified hepatocytes, an effect nearly doubled by WY-14,643. Further, when conditioned medium from purified Kupffer cells incubated with WY-14,643 was added to pure hepatocytes, DNA synthesis was increased over 2-fold in a time-dependent manner. Collectively, these data support the hypothesis that peroxisome proliferators do not influence DNA synthesis in isolated hepatocytes per se. Rather, they stimulate cytokine production by Kupffer cells which in turn increases DNA synthesis in parenchymal cells. An increase in mitogenic cytokine production by Kupffer cells is necessary for stimulation of DNA synthesis in purified rat parenchymal cells.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
C. G. Woods, A. M. Burns, B. U. Bradford, P. K. Ross, O. Kosyk, J. A. Swenberg, M. L. Cunningham, and I. Rusyn
WY-14,643 Induced Cell Proliferation and Oxidative Stress in Mouse Liver are Independent of NADPH Oxidase
Toxicol. Sci., August 1, 2007; 98(2): 366 - 374.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol PatholHome page
C. G. Woods, J. P. Vanden Heuvel, and I. Rusyn
Genomic Profiling in Nuclear Receptor-Mediated Toxicity
Toxicol Pathol, June 1, 2007; 35(4): 474 - 494.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
Q. Yang, S. Ito, and F. J. Gonzalez
Hepatocyte-restricted constitutive activation of PPAR{alpha} induces hepatoproliferation but not hepatocarcinogenesis
Carcinogenesis, June 1, 2007; 28(6): 1171 - 1177.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
R. A. Roberts, P. E. Ganey, C. Ju, L. M. Kamendulis, I. Rusyn, and J. E. Klaunig
Role of the Kupffer Cell in Mediating Hepatic Toxicity and Carcinogenesis
Toxicol. Sci., March 1, 2007; 96(1): 2 - 15.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
C. Drucker, W. Parzefall, O. Teufelhofer, M. Grusch, A. Ellinger, R. Schulte-Hermann, and B. Grasl-Kraupp
Non-parenchymal liver cells support the growth advantage in the first stages of hepatocarcinogenesis
Carcinogenesis, January 1, 2006; 27(1): 152 - 161.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
O. Teufelhofer, W. Parzefall, E. Kainzbauer, F. Ferk, C. Freiler, S. Knasmuller, L. Elbling, R. Thurman, and R. Schulte-Hermann
Superoxide generation from Kupffer cells contributes to hepatocarcinogenesis: studies on NADPH oxidase knockout mice
Carcinogenesis, February 1, 2005; 26(2): 319 - 329.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
T. C. Weglarz and E. P. Sandgren
Cell cross-talk mediates PPAR{alpha} null hepatocyte proliferation after peroxisome proliferator exposure
Carcinogenesis, January 1, 2004; 25(1): 107 - 112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
E. S. Tien, J. P. Gray, J. M. Peters, and J. P. Vanden Heuvel
Comprehensive Gene Expression Analysis of Peroxisome Proliferator-treated Immortalized Hepatocytes: Identification of Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor {alpha}-dependent Growth Regulatory Genes
Cancer Res., September 15, 2003; 63(18): 5767 - 5780.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.