Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pepponi, R.
Right arrow Articles by D'Atri, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pepponi, R.
Right arrow Articles by D'Atri, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Carcinogenesis, Vol. 22, No. 8, 1131-1137, August 2001
© 2001 Oxford University Press


CANCER BIOLOGY

hMSH3 overexpression and cellular response to cytotoxic anticancer agents

Rita Pepponi, Grazia Graziani,1, Sabrina Falcinelli, Patrizia Vernole,2, Lauretta Levati, Pedro Miguel Lacal, Elena Pagani, Enzo Bonmassar, Josef Jiricny,3 and Stefania D'Atri,4

Laboratory of Pharmacology, Istituto Dermopatico Dell'Immacolata (IDI-IRCCS), Via dei Monti di Creta 104, 00167 Rome,
1 Department of Neuroscience, Pharmacology and Medical Oncology Section and
2 Department of Public Health and Cell Biology, University of Rome `Tor Vergata', Via di Tor Vergata 135, 00133 Rome, Italy and
3 Institute for Medical Radiobiology, University of Zurich, August Forel-Strasse 7, CH-8029 Zurich, Switzerland

Mutations or transcriptional silencing of mismatch repair genes have been linked with tumour cell resistance to O6-guanine methylating agents, 6-thioguanine, cisplatin, doxorubicin and etoposide. Recently, it has been demonstrated that overexpression of the MSH3 protein is associated with depletion of the mismatch binding factor MutS{alpha}, and then with a marked reduction in the efficiency of base/base mismatch repair. In the present study we evaluated sensitivity of the HL-60 cell line and its methotrexate-resistant subline HL-60R, which overexpresses the hMSH3 gene, to a panel of chemotherapeutic agents. Cell growth inhibition induced by temozolomide, 6-thioguanine and N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine was significantly lower in the hMSH3-overexpressing HL-60R cell line as compared with the HL-60 parental line. Moreover, HL-60R cells were more resistant than HL-60 cells to chromosome aberrations induced by either N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine or temozolomide, and to apoptosis triggered by the latter drug. Both cell lines were equally susceptible to growth inhibition induced by cisplatin, etoposide or doxorubicin. In addition, HL-60 and HL-60R cells showed comparable sensitivity to the clastogenic and apoptotic effects of cisplatin and etoposide. These results further confirm that loss of base/base mismatch repair is the most important molecular mechanism involved in cell resistance to O6-guanine methylating agents and 6-thioguanine. However, the status of the mismatch repair system could still influence tumour cell sensitivity to cisplatin, etoposide and doxorubicin, depending on the specific component of the system that is lost, and on the genetic background of the cell.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
H. Bernstein, C. M. Payne, K. Kunke, C. L. Crowley-Weber, C. N. Waltmire, K. Dvorakova, H. Holubec, C. Bernstein, R. R. Vaillancourt, D. A. Raynes, et al.
A proteomic study of resistance to deoxycholate-induced apoptosis
Carcinogenesis, May 1, 2004; 25(5): 681 - 692.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
A Brieger, J Trojan, J Raedle, G Plotz, and S Zeuzem
Transient mismatch repair gene transfection for functional analysis of genetic hMLH1 and hMSH2 variants
Gut, November 1, 2002; 51(5): 677 - 684.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.