Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Imaida, K.
Right arrow Articles by Shirai, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Imaida, K.
Right arrow Articles by Shirai, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Carcinogenesis, Vol. 22, No. 8, 1295-1299, August 2001
© 2001 Oxford University Press


CARCINOGENESIS

Organ dependent enhancement of rat 3,2'-dimethyl-4-aminobiphenyl (DMAB) carcinogenesis by 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine (PhIP): positive effects on the intestine but not the prostate

Katsumi Imaida1,, Masashi Sano, Seiko Tamano, Makoto Asamoto, Kumiko Ogawa, Mitsuru Futakuchi and Tomoyuki Shirai

First Department of Pathology, Nagoya City University Medical School, 1-Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya 467-8601, Japan

In order to evaluate tumor enhancing effects of the heterocyclic carcinogen, 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine (PhIP), doses of 100 and 300 p.p.m. PhIP were given for 40 weeks to male F344 rats, which initially received 3,2'-dimethyl-4-aminobiphenyl (DMAB). DMAB shows a similar carcinogenic organ spectrum to that of PhIP, including the prostate and colon. PhIP alone at a dose of 300 p.p.m. resulted in the development of prostate and intestine cancers. Furthermore, among the DMAB-treated group, enhancement of intestinal carcinogenesis by 300 p.p.m. PhIP was observed. However, no prostate enhancement was demonstrated in the DMAB + PhIP group. Since PhIP–DNA adduct formation in the prostate epithelial cells in a satellite experiment was not affected by pre-treatment with DMAB, it is speculated that the contradictory findings between the intestine and prostate may be due to the specific biological effects of PhIP. Taking into account previous data, that PhIP clearly enhanced rat 1,2-dimethylhydrazine-initiated colon tumorigenesis, the potential of PhIP to enhance colon carcinogenesis may be initiator dependent.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.