Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (19)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wood, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Archer, M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wood, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Archer, M. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Carcinogenesis, Vol. 23, No. 1, 1-9, January 2002
© 2002 Oxford University Press


REVIEW

Tissue-specific resistance to cancer development in the rat: phenotypes of tumor-modifier genes

Geoffrey A. Wood1, James E. Korkola1,3 and Michael C. Archer1,2,4

1 Department of Medical Biophysics and
2 Department of Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 150 College Street, Toronto M5S 3E2, Canada

Resistance to carcinogenesis in the rat is both strain- and tissue-specific. The phenotypic characteristics of resistance in the mammary gland, liver and peripheral nervous system (PNS) are strikingly similar. In all three tissues, initiation is intact with subsequent formation of preneoplastic cells and lesions. In the mammary gland and PNS, activation of the Ha-ras and neu proto-oncogenes, respectively, takes place. A number of different modifier genes are involved in resistance, many of which appear to be tissue-specific in their action with no overlap between strains. A single resistance phenotype, however, involving the formation, growth and subsequent loss of preneoplastic lesions is common to all three tissues of resistant strains. In the PNS, there is evidence that preneoplastic cells are eliminated by apoptosis or immunosurveillance. In the mammary gland and liver, the immune system is not involved in the loss of preneoplastic lesions and there are no clear differences between susceptible and resistant strains in the kinetics of proliferation and apoptosis of preneoplastic cells. The evidence to date favors a mechanism in which preneoplastic cells from these tissues undergo a process of remodeling/redifferentiation to yield cells with a normal phenotype. Identification of human homologues of rodent tumormodifier genes will result in a better understanding of cancer development and potentially provide new strategies for prevention and therapy.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
X. Ren, X. Zhang, A. S. Kim, A. M. Mikheev, M. Fang, R. C. Sullivan, R. E. Bumgarner, and H. Zarbl
Comparative genomics of susceptibility to mammary carcinogenesis among inbred rat strains: role of reduced prolactin signaling in resistance of the Copenhagen strain
Carcinogenesis, January 1, 2008; 29(1): 177 - 185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
K. M. Gering, J. A.M. Marx, K. Lennartz, C. Fischer, M. F. Rajewsky, and A. Kindler-Rohrborn
The Interaction Mode of Premalignant Schwann and Immune Effector Cells during Chemically Induced Carcinogenesis in the Rat Peripheral Nervous System Is Strongly Influenced by Genetic Background.
Cancer Res., May 1, 2006; 66(9): 4708 - 4714.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
E. M. de Almeida Vasconcelos Fonseca, C. E. A. Chagas, R. P. Mazzantini, R. Heidor, T. P. Ong, and F. S. Moreno
All-trans and 9-cis retinoic acids, retinol and {beta}-carotene chemopreventive activities during the initial phases of hepatocarcinogenesis involve distinct actions on glutathione S-transferase positive preneoplastic lesions remodeling and DNA damage
Carcinogenesis, November 1, 2005; 26(11): 1940 - 1946.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
C. Quan and S.-J. Lu
Identification of genes preferentially expressed in mammary epithelial cells of Copenhagen rat using subtractive hybridization and microarrays
Carcinogenesis, October 1, 2003; 24(10): 1593 - 1599.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
T. A. Dragani
10 Years of Mouse Cancer Modifier Loci: Human Relevance
Cancer Res., June 15, 2003; 63(12): 3011 - 3018.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
M. R. De Miglio, R. M. Pascale, M. M. Simile, M. R. Muroni, D. F. Calvisi, P. Virdis, G. M. Bosinco, M. Frau, M. A. Seddaiu, S. Ladu, et al.
Chromosome Mapping of Multiple Loci Affecting the Genetic Predisposition to Rat Liver Carcinogenesis
Cancer Res., August 1, 2002; 62(15): 4459 - 4463.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.