Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Carcinogenesis, Vol. 23, No. 12, 2129-2133, December 2002
© 2002 Oxford University Press


CARCINOGENESIS

Comparative analysis of baseline 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine in mammalian cell DNA, by different methods in different laboratories: an approach to consensus

Escodd (European Standards Committee On Oxidative Dna Damage)*

Corresponding author: Professor Andrew Collins, Rowett Research Institute, Greenburn Road, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB21 9SB, UK Email: a.collins{at}rri.sari.ac.uk

The European Standards Committee on Oxidative DNA Damage (ESCODD) was set up to resolve the problems associated with the measurement of background levels of oxidative DNA damage (in particular 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine, or 8-oxoGua) in human cells. A tendency for DNA oxidation to occur during sample preparation prior to chromatography has been recognized as the source of a very substantial artefact. To assess the success of attempts to eliminate the artefact, ESCODD has distributed to its members standard samples of pig liver and HeLa cells for analysis. Estimates of 8-oxoGua in pig liver, using chromatographic techniques, ranged from 2.23 to 441 per 106 guanines, with a median of 10.47 per 106 guanines. Chromatographic analysis of HeLa cell DNA gave a range of 1.84 to 214 per 106 guanines with a median of 5.23 per 106 guanines. HeLa cell DNA was also analysed by an enzymic approach, in which whole cell DNA was treated with formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase, which nicks DNA at sites of 8-oxoGua, and the breaks measured with the comet assay, alkaline unwinding or alkaline elution. Values with these methods ranged from 0.06 to 4.988-oxoGua per 106 guanines, with a median of 0.79 per 106 guanines. Although there are clearly still serious discrepancies between methods and laboratories, the lowest estimates by chromatography (arguably those in which the artefact was best controlled) are only 2.5 times higher than the median value obtained with the enzymic approach.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
M. Dusinska and A. R. Collins
The comet assay in human biomonitoring: gene-environment interactions
Mutagenesis, May 1, 2008; 23(3): 191 - 205.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
C. Trapp, M. Schwarz, and B. Epe
The Peroxisome Proliferator WY-14,643 Promotes Hepatocarcinogenesis Caused by Endogenously Generated Oxidative DNA Base Modifications in Repair-Deficient Csbm/m/Ogg1-/- Mice
Cancer Res., June 1, 2007; 67(11): 5156 - 5161.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
J. K. Folkmann, S. Loft, and P. Moller
Oxidatively damaged DNA in aging dyslipidemic ApoE-/- and wild-type mice
Mutagenesis, March 1, 2007; 22(2): 105 - 110.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
L. R. Ferguson, M. Philpott, and N. Karunasinghe
Oxidative DNA Damage and Repair: Significance and Biomarkers
J. Nutr., October 1, 2006; 136(10): 2687S - 2689S.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol PatholHome page
A. M. Hays, D. Srinivasan, M. L. Witten, D. E. Carter, and R. C. Lantz
Arsenic and Cigarette Smoke Synergistically Increase DNA Oxidation in the Lung
Toxicol Pathol, June 1, 2006; 34(4): 396 - 404.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
Y.-J. Liu, P.-L. Huang, Y.-F. Chang, Y.-H. Chen, Y.-H. Chiou, Z.-L. Xu, and R.-H. Wong
GSTP1 Genetic Polymorphism Is Associated with a Higher Risk of DNA Damage in Pesticide-Exposed Fruit Growers.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2006; 15(4): 659 - 666.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J BiochemHome page
Y. Tanaka, N. Nakagawa, S. Kuramitsu, S. Yokoyama, and R. Masui
Novel Reaction Mechanism of GTP Cyclohydrolase I. High-Resolution X-Ray Crystallography of Thermus thermophilus HB8 Enzyme Complexed with a Transition State Analogue, the 8-Oxoguanine Derivative
J. Biochem., September 1, 2005; 138(3): 263 - 275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
A. R Collins
Assays for oxidative stress and antioxidant status: applications to research into the biological effectiveness of polyphenols
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 2005; 81(1): 261S - 267S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
I. Rusyn, S. Asakura, B. Pachkowski, B. U. Bradford, M. F. Denissenko, J. M. Peters, S. M. Holland, J. K. Reddy, M. L. Cunningham, and J. A. Swenberg
Expression of Base Excision DNA Repair Genes Is a Sensitive Biomarker for in Vivo Detection of Chemical-induced Chronic Oxidative Stress: Identification of the Molecular Source of Radicals Responsible for DNA Damage by Peroxisome Proliferators
Cancer Res., February 1, 2004; 64(3): 1050 - 1057.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
U. Nair, H. Bartsch, and J. Nair
Prevention of degenerative diseases; clues from studies investigating oxidative stress, Brussels, 13 November 2002
Mutagenesis, September 1, 2003; 18(5): 477 - 483.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Loft, T. Kold-Jensen, N. H. Hjollund, A. Giwercman, J. Gyllemborg, E. Ernst, J. Olsen, T. Scheike, H. E. Poulsen, and J. P. Bonde
Oxidative DNA damage in human sperm influences time to pregnancy
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2003; 18(6): 1265 - 1272.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.