Carcinogenesis Advance Access originally published online on September 26, 2003
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Carcinogenesis, Vol. 25, No. 1, 61-67,
January 2004
© Oxford University Press; all rights reserved
MOLECULAR EPIDEMIOLOGY AND CANCER PREVENTION |
Induction of cytochrome P450, generation of oxidative stress and in vitro cell-transforming and DNA-damaging activities by glucoraphanin, the bioprecursor of the chemopreventive agent sulforaphane found in broccoli
1 Department of Pharmacology, 2 Institute of Cancerology, 3 Department of Organic Chemistry ‘A. Mangini’, Alma-Mater Studiorum—University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy, 4 Research Institute for Industrial Crops (MIPAF), Bologna, Italy, 5 Institute of Biology and Agricultural Biotechnology (IBBA)—CNR Research Area, Pisa, Italy and 6 Department of Preventive Medicine and Community Health, Division of Environmental Toxicology, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Texas, USA
The reduced cancer risk that appears to be linked to a diet rich in fruits and vegetables has fueled the belief that regular intake of isolated phytochemicals could potentially prevent cancer. In recent years, the glucosinolate metabolites derived from cruciferous vegetables, such as the isothiocyanate sulforaphane in broccoli, have gained much attention as potential cancer chemopreventive agents. The protective effect of sulforaphane, which is liberated from its glucosinolate precursor glucoraphanin (GRP) by myrosinase hydrolysis, is conventionally thought to involve the induction of Phase-II metabolizing enzymes. These Phase-II enzymes are implicated in the detoxication of many carcinogens and reactive oxygen species (ROS), thereby protecting cells against DNA damage and subsequent malignant transformation. While the induction of Phase-II enzymes is usually considered beneficial, in some cases these enzymes also bioactivate several hazardous chemicals. Furthermore, despite its projected benefits, the unknown effect of sulforaphane on Phase-I enzyme systems, which are involved in the bioactivation of a variety of carcinogens, should not be overlooked. Here we show that, in rat lungs, while GRP, the bioprecursor of the chemopreventive agent sulforaphane, slightly induced Phase-II detoxifying enzymes, it powerfully induced Phase-I carcinogen-activating enzymes, including activators of carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Concomitant with this Phase-I induction, GRP also over-generated ROS. Additionally, in a cell-transforming assay, GRP facilitated the metabolic activation of the PAH benzo[a]pyrene to reactive carcinogenic forms and in a yeast genotoxicity test it damaged DNA. This suggests that regular administration of GRP could actually increase rather than decrease cancer risk, especially in individuals exposed to environmental mutagens and carcinogens such as those found in tobacco smoke and in certain industrial settings.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  D. Chaudhuri, S. Orsulic, and B. T. Ashok Antiproliferative activity of sulforaphane in Akt-overexpressing ovarian cancer cells Mol. Cancer Ther., January 1, 2007; 6(1): 334 - 345. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. A. Ritz, J. Wan, and D. Diaz-Sanchez Sulforaphane-stimulated phase II enzyme induction inhibits cytokine production by airway epithelial cells stimulated with diesel extract Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, January 1, 2007; 292(1): L33 - L39. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. H. Fowke, J. D. Morrow, S. Motley, R. M. Bostick, and R. M. Ness Brassica vegetable consumption reduces urinary F2-isoprostane levels independent of micronutrient intake Carcinogenesis, October 1, 2006; 27(10): 2096 - 2102. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. Kim, E. H. Kim, Y. W. Eom, W.-H. Kim, T. K. Kwon, S. J. Lee, and K. S. Choi Sulforaphane Sensitizes Tumor Necrosis Factor-Related Apoptosis-Inducing Ligand (TRAIL)-Resistant Hepatoma Cells to TRAIL-Induced Apoptosis through Reactive Oxygen Species-Mediated Up-regulation of DR5 Cancer Res., February 1, 2006; 66(3): 1740 - 1750. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. V. Singh, S. K. Srivastava, S. Choi, K. L. Lew, J. Antosiewicz, D. Xiao, Y. Zeng, S. C. Watkins, C. S. Johnson, D. L. Trump, et al. Sulforaphane-induced Cell Death in Human Prostate Cancer Cells Is Initiated by Reactive Oxygen Species J. Biol. Chem., May 20, 2005; 280(20): 19911 - 19924. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. M. Visanji, S. J. Duthie, L. Pirie, D. G. Thompson, and P. J. Padfield Dietary Isothiocyanates Inhibit Caco-2 Cell Proliferation and Induce G2/M Phase Cell Cycle Arrest, DNA Damage, and G2/M Checkpoint Activation J. Nutr., November 1, 2004; 134(11): 3121 - 3126. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|