Carcinogenesis Advance Access originally published online on December 19, 2003
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Carcinogenesis, Vol. 25, No. 4, 499-507,
April 2004
Carcinogenesis vol.25 no.4 © Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved.
CANCER BIOLOGY |
Methylated DNA-binding protein 2 antisense inhibitors suppress tumourigenesis of human cancer cell lines in vitro and in vivo
Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, McGill University, 3655 Sir William Osler Promenade, Montreal, Quebec H3G1Y6, Canada
Methylated DNA-binding protein 2 (MBD2) has been proposed to function both as a silencer of methylated genes and as a DNA demethylase. Our previous data indicated that knockdown of MBD2 inhibited tumourigenesis of human cancer lines and MBD2-deficient mice were recently shown to be resistant to intestinal tumourigenesis. MBD2 is an attractive anticancer target since MBD2-deficient mice were previously shown to be viable and fertile and knockdown of MBD2 was reported to have no effect on cellular growth parameters of non-transformed cells. In this paper we test the hypothesis that pharmacological inhibition of MBD2 inhibits cancer growth in vivo using human tumour lines implanted in mice as a model. We develop sequence-specific antisense inhibitors of MBD2 and we show that these agents inhibit anchorage-independent growth of human lung (A549) and colorectal (HCT116) cancer cell lines in vitro and tumourigenic growth of human cancer cell xenografts in vivo. MBD2 antisense oligonucleotide does not inhibit the growth of normal and transformed cell lines and does not alter cell cycle parameters in vitro and does not exhibit overt toxicity in vivo in comparison with a scrambled control oligonucleotide, as determined by measuring body mass, blood cell parameters and liver and kidney enzymes. Our data provide a proof of principle that MBD2 is a new anticancer target and that pharmacological inhibition of MBD2 by agents such as the antisense inhibitors described in this paper is a potential new anticancer therapy, which in contrast to the vast majority of current approaches does not target normal progression of the cell cycle.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. Merimi, P. Klener, M. Szynal, Y. Cleuter, P. Kerkhofs, A. Burny, P. Martiat, and A. Van den Broeke Suppression of Viral Gene Expression in Bovine Leukemia Virus-Associated B-Cell Malignancy: Interplay of Epigenetic Modifications Leading to Chromatin with a Repressive Histone Code J. Virol., June 1, 2007; 81(11): 5929 - 5939. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. Shukeir, P. Pakneshan, G. Chen, M. Szyf, and S. A. Rabbani Alteration of the Methylation Status of Tumor-Promoting Genes Decreases Prostate Cancer Cell Invasiveness and Tumorigenesis In vitro and In vivo. Cancer Res., September 15, 2006; 66(18): 9202 - 9210. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. Auriol, L.-M. Billard, F. Magdinier, and R. Dante Specific binding of the methyl binding domain protein 2 at the BRCA1-NBR2 locus Nucleic Acids Res., July 28, 2005; 33(13): 4243 - 4254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. H. Lund and M. van Lohuizen Epigenetics and cancer Genes & Dev., October 1, 2004; 18(19): 2315 - 2335. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. Pakneshan, M. Szyf, R. Farias-Eisner, and S. A. Rabbani Reversal of the Hypomethylation Status of Urokinase (uPA) Promoter Blocks Breast Cancer Growth and Metastasis J. Biol. Chem., July 23, 2004; 279(30): 31735 - 31744. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|