Skip Navigation


Carcinogenesis Advance Access originally published online on December 4, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
25/4/637    most recent
bgh040v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boyiri, T.
Right arrow Articles by El-Bayoumy, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boyiri, T.
Right arrow Articles by El-Bayoumy, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Carcinogenesis, Vol. 25, No. 4, 637-643, April 2004
Carcinogenesis vol.25 no.4 © Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved.


CARCINOGENESIS

Mammary carcinogenesis and molecular analysis of in vivo cII gene mutations in the mammary tissue of female transgenic rats treated with the environmental pollutant 6-nitrochrysene

Telih Boyiri1, Joseph Guttenplan2,3, Michael Khmelnitsky2, Wieslawa Kosinska2, Jyh-Ming Lin1, Dhimant Desai1, Shantu Amin1, Brian Pittman1 and Karam El-Bayoumy1,4

1 American Health Foundation Cancer Center, Institute for Cancer Prevention, Valhalla, NY 10595, USA, 2 Department of Basic Science, New York University Dental Center, New York, NY 10010, USA and 3 Department of Environmental Medicine, New York University, Medical Center, New York, NY 10016, USA

We determined the mutant fractions (MF) and mutational specificities in the cII gene in histologically confirmed normal, non-involved and tumor mammary tissues of female transgenic (Big Blue F344 x Sprague-Dawley)F1 rats treated with the environmental pollutant 6-nitrochrysene (6-NC). At 30 days of age, three groups were set up for oral treatment with 6-NC dissolved in trioctanoin, or trioctanoin alone once a week for 8 weeks. Two dose levels of 6-NC (100 and 200 µmol/rat) were selected on the basis of our previous carcinogenicity bioassays with CD rats. The rats were decapitated 32 weeks after the last carcinogen dose. Both incidence and multiplicity of mammary adenocarcinomas were significantly elevated in the high dose (36%, 0.57, P < 0.01) group but at the low dose these outcomes (16%, 0.23, P < 0.1) were not significantly different from those of control rats (3%, 0.03). The MF in normal, non-involved and tumor tissues from the mammary glands of 6-NC-treated rats were comparable. At the high and low doses, respectively (4.8 ± 2.0, 3.2 ± 2.1) the MF of 6-NC-treated rats, were significantly higher (P < 0.05) than that observed in control rats (1.2 ± 0.6). Control mutants consisted primarily of GC -> AT transitions, whereas 6-NC-induced mutants were comprised of several major classes of mutations with GC -> TA, GC -> CG, AT -> GC and AT -> TA as the most prevalent. Further studies indicated that the structures of 6-NC–DNA adducts in the mammary tissue are consistent with the mutational specificities. This is the first report that defines the relationship between carcinogenesis and mutagenesis, as well as between structures of 6-NC–DNA adducts and mutation characteristics in the target organ in vivo.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
J. B. Guttenplan, Z.-l. Zhao, W. Kosinska, R. G. Norman, J. Krzeminski, Y.-W. Sun, S. Amin, and K. El-Bayoumy
Comparative mutational profiles of the environmental mammary carcinogen, 6-nitrochrysene and its metabolites in a lacI mammary epithelial cell line
Carcinogenesis, November 1, 2007; 28(11): 2391 - 2397.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.