Skip Navigation


Carcinogenesis Advance Access originally published online on January 23, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
25/6/909    most recent
bgh075v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bartling, B.
Right arrow Articles by Zhivotovsky, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bartling, B.
Right arrow Articles by Zhivotovsky, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Carcinogenesis, Vol. 25, No. 6, 909-921, June 2004
Carcinogenesis vol.25 no.6 © Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved.


ARTICLE

RasGTPase-activating protein is a target of caspases in spontaneous apoptosis of lung carcinoma cells and in response to etoposide

Babett Bartling1, Jiang-Yan Yang2, David Michod2, Christian Widmann2, Rolf Lewensohn3 and Boris Zhivotovsky1,4

1 Institute of Environmental Medicine, Division of Toxicology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, 2 Institut de Biologie Cellulaire et de Morphologie, Université de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland and 3 Institute of Oncology and Pathology, Unit of Medical Radiobiology, Cancer Centre Karolinska R8:00, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

4 To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: boris.zhivotovsky{at}imm.ki.se

p120 RasGTPase-activating protein (RasGAP), the main regulator of Ras GTPase family members, is cleaved at low caspase activity into an N-terminal fragment that triggers potent anti-apoptotic signals via activation of the Ras/PI-3 kinase/Akt pathway. When caspase activity is increased, RasGAP fragment N is further processed into two fragments that effectively potentiate apoptosis. Expression of RasGAP protein and its cleavage was assessed in human lung cancer cells with different histology and responsiveness to anticancer drug-induced apoptosis. Here we show that therapy-sensitive small lung carcinoma cell (SCLC) lines have lower RasGAP expression levels and higher spontaneous cleavage with formation of fragment N compared to therapy-resistant non-small cell lung carcinoma cell (NSCLC) lines. The first RasGAP cleavage event strongly correlated with the increased level of spontaneous apoptosis in SCLC. However, generation of protective RasGAP fragment N also related to the potency of SCLC to develop secondary therapy-resistance. In response to etoposide (ET), RasGAP fragment N was further cleaved in direct dependence on caspase-3 activity, which was more pronounced in NSCLC cells. Caspase inhibition, while effectively preventing the second cleavage of RasGAP, barely affected the first cleavage of RasGAP into fragment N that was always detectable in NSCLC and SCLC cells. These findings suggest that different levels of RasGAP and fragment N might play a significant role in the biology and different clinical course of both subtypes of lung neoplasms. Furthermore, constitutive formation of RasGAP fragment N can potentially contribute to primary resistance of NSCLC to anticancer therapy by ET but also to secondary therapy-resistance in SCLC.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
J.-Y. Yang, J. Walicki, D. Michod, G. Dubuis, and C. Widmann
Impaired Akt Activity Down-Modulation, Caspase-3 Activation, and Apoptosis in Cells Expressing a Caspase-resistant Mutant of RasGAP at Position 157
Mol. Biol. Cell, August 1, 2005; 16(8): 3511 - 3520.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.