Skip Navigation


Carcinogenesis Advance Access originally published online on September 14, 2006
Carcinogenesis 2007 28(3):611-624; doi:10.1093/carcin/bgl174
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
28/3/611    most recent
bgl174v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Margaret Pratt, M.
Right arrow Articles by Bailey, G. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Margaret Pratt, M.
Right arrow Articles by Bailey, G. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

The importance of carcinogen dose in chemoprevention studies: quantitative interrelationships between, dibenzo[a,l]pyrene dose, chlorophyllin dose, target organ DNA adduct biomarkers and final tumor outcome

M. Margaret Pratt1,4,*, Ashok P. Reddy1,5, Jerry D. Hendricks1, Cliff Pereira2, Thomas W. Kensler3 and George S. Bailey1

1 Department of Environmental and Molecular Toxicology, Corvallis, OR 97339 USA
2 Department of Statistics, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97339 USA
3 Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
4 Present address: Carcinogen–DNA Interactions Section, Laboratory of Cellular Carcinogenesis and Tumor Promotion, Center for Cancer Research, Building 37, Room 4032, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
5 Present address: Center for Biomarker Discovery, Clinical Genomics and Proteomics Program, Department of Pediatrics, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97201 USA

*To whom correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed. Tel: +1 301 435 4527; Fax: +1 301 402 8230; Email: prattm{at}mail.nih.gov

Chlorophyllin (CHL) is a potent antimutagen in vitro, an effective anti-carcinogen in several animal models, and significantly reduced urinary biomarkers of aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) exposure in a human population. Here we report an expanded analysis of CHL chemoprevention using the potent environmental hydrocarbon dibenzo[a,l]pyrene (DBP). A dose–dose matrix design employed over 12 000 rainbow trout to evaluate the interrelationships among dietary carcinogen dose, anti-carcinogen dose, carcinogen–DNA adduct levels at exposure and eventual tumor outcome in two target organs. Included was an evaluation of the pharmaceutical CHL preparation (Derifil), used previously in a study of individuals chronically exposed to AFB1. CHL was pre-, co- and post-fed at doses of 0–6000 p.p.m. and co-fed with DBP at doses of 0–371.5 p.p.m. for 4 weeks. This protocol generated a total of 21 dose–dose treatment groups, each evaluated with three or more replicates of 100 animals. The DBP-only treatment produced dose-responsive increases in liver and stomach DBP–DNA adducts, whereas increasing CHL co-treatment doses produced successive inhibition in liver (49–83%) and stomach (47–75%) adduct levels at each DBP dose examined. The remaining 8711 trout were necropsied, 10 months later. DBP treatment alone produced a logit incidence versus log [DBP] dose–response curve in stomach that was linear; CHL co-treatment provided dose-dependent tumor inhibition which ranged from 30 to 68% and was predictable from the adduct response. The Derifil CHL preparation was also found to effectively reduce DNA adduction and final tumor incidence in stomach (as well as liver), with a potency compatible with its total chlorin content. Liver tumor incidence in the DBP-only groups appeared to plateau near 60%. At DBP doses of ≤80 p.p.m., increasing CHL doses generally reduced tumor incidence and multiplicity consistent with early DNA adducts as biomarkers. At 225 p.p.m. DBP, however, very high CHL doses were required to reduce tumor incidence below the 60% plateau. Apparent tumor multiplicity in liver was neither linear nor monotonic with DBP dose, but peaked at 80 p.p.m. DBP and declined at 225 p.p.m., where it was increased by all but one CHL dose. Consequently, the effects of a given CHL dose and the predictivity of DNA adducts as biomarkers were highly dependent on carcinogen dose. These results underscore the critical importance of establishing carcinogen-end point dose–response relationships in chemoprevention studies, and the potential otherwise for misleading interpretations in chemoprevention studies carried out solely at high-carcinogen dose. (Supported by USPHS grants ES03850, ES00210, CA34732, ES07060, ES06052 and ES03819.)

Abbreviations: AFB1, aflatoxin B1; CHL, chlorophyllin; DBP, dibenzo[a,l]pyrene; DMBA, 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene; OTD, Oregon test diet; PAHs, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; TPA, 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate.

Received April 17, 2006; revised August 9, 2006; accepted September 1, 2006.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
D. J. Castro, C. V. Lohr, K. A. Fischer, K. M. Waters, B.-J. M. Webb-Robertson, R. H. Dashwood, G. S. Bailey, and D. E. Williams
Identifying efficacious approaches to chemoprevention with chlorophyllin, purified chlorophylls and freeze-dried spinach in a mouse model of transplacental carcinogenesis
Carcinogenesis, February 1, 2009; 30(2): 315 - 320.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.