Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (24)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hard, G. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hard, G. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1985 Oxford University Press

research-article

Differential renal tumor response to N-ethylnitrosourea and dimethylnitrosamine in the Nb rat: basis for a new rodent model of nephroblastoma

Gordon C. Hard 1

Fels Research Institute, Temple University School of Medicine 3420 N.Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA

Previous studies have indicated that the Nb rat has a higher predisposition to the spontaneous development of nephro-blastoma than most other strains of laboratory rat. In order to determine whether this inherent susceptibility could be exploited as a model for Wilms' tumor, Nb rats were treated with various chemicals in regimens known to be associated with renal tumor induction in the young rat. Nb rats were either exposed in utero to various dose levels of N-ethylnitrosourea (ENU) on day 18 ± 1 of gestation, injected s.c. with one 25 mg/kg dose of dimethylnitrosamine (DMN) as neonates or dosed twice orally with 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene (DMBA) shortly after ovariectomy. Transplancental ENU at a dose of 60 mg/kg resulted in an average of 50% frequency of unequivocal nephroblastomas in both sexes with no renal mesenchymal tumors. In contrast, DMN administered to neonates produced a similar incidence of renal mesenchymal tumors but no nephroblastomas. DMBA in the ovariectomized female was not a successful strategy for inducing primary renal tumors in the Nb rat (0 nephroblastomas, 1 renal mesenchymal tumor in 16 effective survivors), although the kidney was sometimes the site for metastatic invasion by tumors originating at other locations. The induction of nephroblastomas and renal mesenchymal tumors by ENU and DMN in parallel experiments emphasized the many differences which establish them as distinct and unrelated tumor entities. The relatively high incidence of nephroblastoma in the Nb rat using transplacentally administered ENU appears to represent a suitable basis for developing a rodent model of human nephroblastoma or Wilms' tumor.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Toxicol PatholHome page
G. C. Hard
Mechanisms of Chemically Induced Renal Carcinogenesis in the Laboratory Rodent
Toxicol Pathol, January 1, 1998; 26(1): 104 - 112.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol PatholHome page
A. A. Frank, J. R. Heidel, D. J. Thompson, W. W. Carlton, and J. B. Beckwith
Renal Transplacental Carcinogenicity of 3,3-Dimethyl-1-Phenyltriazene in Rats: Relationship of Renal Mesenchymal Tumor to Congenital Mesoblastic Nephroma and Intralobar Nephrogenic Rests
Toxicol Pathol, January 1, 1992; 20(3-1): 313 - 322.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol PatholHome page
B. C. Lee, J. D. Hendricks, and G. S. Bailey
Iron Resistance of Hepatic Lesions and Nephroblastoma in Rainbow Trout (Salmo gairdneri) Exposed to MNNG
Toxicol Pathol, April 1, 1989; 17(3): 474 - 482.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol PatholHome page
G. C. Hard
Experimental Models for the Sequential Analysis of Chemically-Induced Renal Carcinogenesis
Toxicol Pathol, January 1, 1986; 14(1): 112 - 122.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.