Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (103)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Downes, C.S.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, R. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Downes, C.S.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, R. T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1985 Oxford University Press

research-article

Novobiocin inhibition of DNA excision repair may occur through effects on mitochondrial structure and ATP metabolism, not on repair topoisomerases

C.Stephen Downes , Muriel J. Ord 1, Ann M. Mullinger , Andrew R.S. Collins  and Robert T. Johnson 

Cancer Research Campaign Mammalian Cell DNA Repair Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge Cambridge CB2 3EJ
1Medical Research Council Toxicology Research Unit, Carshalton, Surrey, and Department of Biology, University of Southampton Southampton S09 3TU, UK

Novobiocin inhibits DNA topoisomerases. It also inhibits excision repair of DNA photodamage, blocking both repair synthesis and the earlier step of incision at u.v. damage sites (as measured by the accumulation of DNA strand breaks in u.v.-irradiated interphase cells treated with DNA synthesis inhibitors such as hydroxyurea or cytosine arabinoside). It has been supposed, therefore, that novobiocin affects repair by blocking a putative topoisomerase step prior to incision. But we find that novobiocin also has a marked dose- and time-dependent effect on mitochondria: in cells exposed to novobiocin, mitochondria swell and their cristae become disrupted, and the intracellular ATP: ADP ratio is lowered, though the membrane potential is maintained as judged by rhodamine 123 fluorescence. Mitotic cells are more resistant to mitochondrial disruption by novobiocin than are interphase cells. This correlates with a relative resistance of u.v.-irradiated mitotic cells to the inhibition of incision by novobiocin. The chromosomal decondensation that results from the accumulation of DNA breaks due to incision when u.v.-irradiated mitotic cells are treated with hydroxyurea and cytosine arabinoside is largely suppressed by novobiocin. Furthermore, the suppression of induced strand break accumulation is partly due to a suppression by novobiocin of the uptake and phosphorylation of cytosine arabinoside; breaks accumulated in u.v.-irradiated cells in the presence of aphidicolin, an inhibitor of DNA polymerase alpha that does not require phosphorylation, are less novobiocin-sensitive. We conclude that the effects of novobiocin on excision repair are more likely to be due to a non-specific effect on ATP metabolism than to a specific effect on a repair-related topoisomerase.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
N. Pi, C. L. F. Meyers, M. Pacholec, C. T. Walsh, and J. A. Leary
Mass spectrometric characterization of a three-enzyme tandem reaction for assembly and modification of the novobiocin skeleton
PNAS, July 6, 2004; 101(27): 10036 - 10041.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
A. Lansiaux, F. Tanious, Z. Mishal, L. Dassonneville, A. Kumar, C. E. Stephens, Q. Hu, W. D. Wilson, D. W. Boykin, and C. Bailly
Distribution of Furamidine Analogues in Tumor Cells: Targeting of the Nucleus or Mitochondria Depending on the Amidine Substitution
Cancer Res., December 15, 2002; 62(24): 7219 - 7229.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.